SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Y. Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
M. Nageswara Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This is an appeal preferred by the legal representatives of the deceased claiming compensation in a sum of Rs. 52,000/- under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The accident occurred on 8-4-1984 and the deceased who met with the accident died three days later, on 11-4-1984. At the time of death, the deceased was was aged 40 years and it is claimed that he was earning Rs. 30/- per day by selling kirana articles on his cycle. The Tribunal went into this question and awarded a sum of Rs. 25,600/-, out of which Rs. 21,600/- is relatable to the loss of dependancy and Rs. 4,000/- is towards loss of consortium. Interest was awarded at 6% P.A. from the date of petition. The claimants in this case are the wife, mother and two sons of the deceased.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant, Sri P. Gopaldas representing Sri P. Ramakrishna Raju has contended that the award is liable to be enhanced not only by increasing pecuniary damages but that some amount must be awarded for the non-pecuniary damages, in all cases of death. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company, Sri S. Hanumaiah has, however, contended that the amount awarded b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top