SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAMANYAM
Bandaru Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Ganji Suryanarayana Murthy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Mr. P. Raja Gopal Rao
For The Respondent: Mr. K. Chidambaram

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 16-1-1998 in A.S.No. 45 of 1992 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Narsapur confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 15-7-1992 in O.S.No. 364 of 1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Narsapur. The 1st defendant in the suit is the appellant.

2. Ac. 0-98 cents of land situated in R.S.Nos. 217/5, 217/6, 217/7 and 224 in Kontheru village is plaint "A' schedule property. The total extent in R.S.No. 217/5 is Ac. 0-16 cents. Plaint "B' schedule property forms part of plaint "A' schedule property. Ac. 0-08 cents of land in R.S.No. 217/5 is plaint "B' schedule property. There is a thatched house bearing assessment No. 87 and door No. 3-87 in "B' schedule property. Originally Ganji Ganga Raju and Nalam Subba Rao are the joint owners of plaint "A' schedule property. Ganji Ganga Raju died. After his death, Nalam Subba Rao filed a suit in O.S.No. 102 of 1953 against the legal heirs of G. Ganga Raju for partition of plaint "A' schedule property into equal shares and for allotment of half a share to him. A preliminary decree for partition was granted in favour of Nalam Subba Rao. However, no petition for final

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top