SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.YETHIRAJULU
Lella (Potla) Padmaja – Appellant
Versus
Lella Koteswara Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

DR. G. YETHIRAJULU, J.:— Crl. A. No. 1901 of 1999 was filed by the complainant. The appellant filed a private complaint against 21 accused alleging that they have committed offences under Sections 494, 323, 506, 341 read with 34 I.P.C. and it was numbered as C.C. No. 56 of 1993 on the file of the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntur Charges for the offences are under Sections 498-A, 494, 323, 341, 506(II) of I.P.C. and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 against all the accused. They pleaded not guilty of the offences and claimed for trail. During the pendency of the case, A-20 died, therefore, the case against him stood abated on 14-02-1996.

2. The complainant, in order to prove the guilt of the accused, examined P.Ws. 1 to 5 and did not mark any documents. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced on defence side.

3. The learned Magistrate, after considering the evidence, found the accused not guilty of the offences covered by the charges and recorded their acquittal through the Judgment dated 05-10-1999. The complainant, being aggrieved by the Judgment of the lower Court, preferred this Appeal challenging the validity and legality of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top