SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Vangala Balamallu – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Mr. K. Satyanarayana Rao
For The Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

1. This Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 01.05.1998 passed in S.C. No. 845 of 1996 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, whereby and whereunder the learned II Additional Sessions Judge found A1-Vangala Balamallu guilty for the offences under Sections 304-Part-II and 201 IPC and A3-Gandla Narasiah @ Muthyala Narsaiah guilty for the offence under Section 201 IPC and convicted them accordingly and sentenced A1 to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for three years for the offence under Section 304-Part-II IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for two years for the offence under Section 201 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months and A3 to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for two years for the offence under Section 201 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months.

2. The appellants 1 and 2 herein are A1 and A3. They along with another accused person (A2-Buchala Mallaiah) were put on trial before the II Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar for the offences under Sections 304 and 201 IPC. The prosecution case, in brief, is:—

A1 and A2 are adjacent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top