SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SATYANARAYANA RAJU, MUNIKANNIAH
Gallu Chittemma – Appellant
Versus
Gallu Chinnammi – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SATYANARAYANA RAJU, J.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam, in O.S. No. 107 of 1952.

3. The facts necessary for appreciating the contentions raised in this appeal may be briefly stated. In the village of Bapirajukottapalli, in the Golugonda Taluk of the Visakhapatnam District, there was a Koppula-Velama family, consisting of three brothers, Sambamurti, Ramamurthy and Appalanaidu. Sambamurti and his brothers by their joint exertions acquired certain lands by purchase. Sambamurti had a son by name Narayanamurti. Narayanamurti died on the 12th February 1951. Sambamurti died a few months later in October 1951. The plaintiff is the widow of Narayanamurti. The 1st defendant is her mother-in-law, the 3rd defendant is the daughter of the 2nd defendant. It is claimed by the 2nd defendant that she was marriejd to Narayanamurti and that the 3rd defendant is the off spring of the marriage, Her status as the wife of Narayanamurti is one of the matters in controversy in this appeal. Defendants 4 to 7 are the alienees of certain properties from Sambamurti, his son Narayanamurti, and the 2nd defendant.

4. The plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top