SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHNA RAO
Yeshoda Bai – Appellant
Versus
G. Yeloji Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. She filed a suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from making any constructions in his land so as to infringe the plaintiff's right to light and air on the northern side of the wall of the plaintiff's House bearing No. IV-C-446 and 452 lying east-west situate at Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad and also for a mandatory injunction to remove the constructions made by the defendant resulting in obstruction to light and air which the plaintiff is enjoying through the windows situate in the plaintiff's northern wall. The plaintiff became the owner of the entire property having purchased the same on two occasions. One portion bearing No. 466 containing the eastern and middle windows was purchased under a sale deed Ex. A-7 dated 26-6-53 from one Habibul Rahman Khan. The other portion bearing Nos. 452, 453 and 454 and containing the third and western-mast window was purchased under a sale deed Ex-A-9, dated 17-3-1961 from Ladli Bi and Vazir Bi who are the sisters of Rabia Bi, mother of Habibul Rehman Khan, the vendor under Ex. A-7. In between the two sales, the defendant purchased a vacant site lying immediate to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top