SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.PARVATHA RAO
Potluri Babu Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sistla Neelagriva Sastry – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. These five appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 8-4-1991 of the learned Subordinate Judge at Vijayawada in the two suits O.S. Nos. 248 and 453 of 1981. These two suits were clubbed together and evidence was recorded and documents were marked in O.S. No. 453 of 1981. Both the suits are for specific performance of their respective agreements of sale in respect of the same property described in the plaint schedule in O.S. No. 248 of 1981 and in the plaint-A schedule in O.S. No. 453 of 1981 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Plaint Schedule Property’). Plaint Schedule Property comp rises of an exent of Ac. 1.05 cents of dry land situated in the village of Prasadampadu near Vijayawada in Krishna District (Ac. 0-65 cents in D. No. 63/10 and Ac. 0-66 cents in D. No. 63/11) within the boundaries given in the respective plaint schedules together with Dall Mill known as ‘Gopalakrishna Dall Mill’ with the machinery and the structures detailed and stated in the registered “lease-deed dated 28-2-1977” executed by defendants 1 to 8, who are common in both the suits, in favour of Sri Mahalakshmi Dall Mill, a partnership firm respresented by its partners Hemraj and his son, Madanla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top