A.GOPAL RAO
C. Janardhana Naidu – Appellant
Versus
R. Vasudeva Naidu (Complainant) and State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioner/accused filed this revision petition questioning the validity of the Order, dated 22-11-1993, passed by the II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Tirupati in Crl.MP. No. 1566 of 1992 in C.C. No. 279 of 1991, on his file, dismissing the petition to record compromise. The first respondent-complainant filed a private complaint against the petitioner/accused in the lower Court for offences under Sections 500, 201 and 211 of the Indian Penal Code. The said private complaint was taken on file by the learned Magistrate as C.C. 279 of 1991 under Sections 211 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code. On 8-7-1992, a compromise petition signed by both the parties and their respective advocates was filed in the lower Court. On 29-10-1992, the first respondent/complainant filed an affidavit before the lower Court, stating that he signed the compromise petition on 8-7-1992 at the instance of certain elders and superior officials of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, of which both of the first resondent/complainant and the petitioner/accused are the employees, and that he did not sign the said compromise petition voluntarily. He requested die Court not to record the compromise. On 24-2-19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.