SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.D.PATNAIK
Nomula Anjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
Nomula Hymavathi – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Respondents 1 and 2 who are wife and child of the petitioner have filed a petition M.C. 19/81 for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in the court of the Munsif Magistrate, Khammam alleging that the petitioner neglected to maintain them. The petitioner took objection to the jurisdiction of the court contending that as the respondents were residing at Bhadrachalam, the Munsif Magistrate's Court at Khammam had no jurisdiction. The learned Munsif Magistrate accepted the contention and dismissed that petition. Against that a revision petition was filed before the Sessions Judge, Khammam who allowed the same and remanded the matter to the trial court for fresh disposal after giving opportunity to parties to adduce further evidence. After remand, the Munsif Magistrate, Khammam held that the court has got jurisdiction and also accepted the case of the respondents i.e. petitioners in M.C. that the petitioner neglected to maintain them and awarded maintenance at the rate of Rs. 150/- P.M. for the wife and Rs. 100/- p.m. for the child. Against that the petitioner filed a revision to the Sessions Judge. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge who heard the revision held that the court o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top