SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 348

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
V. Nageswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Devadass Balantha, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J. - This batch of Criminal Petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are filed by various petitioners seeking quash of the F.I.R. and the charge-sheet respectively in various cases registered under Sections 54 and 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for short, "the FSS Act"), under Sections 270 and 273 of I.P.C. and under Sections 22 r/w.5 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003, (for short, "the COTP Act") and also other offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.

2. Since common issue is involved whether the products in question viz., Gutka, Khaini and Tobacco etc. fall within the definition of 'food' as defined under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act and whether Police are competent to investigate such offences and whether the facts of the cases give raise to any criminal liability for the offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code for which the cases are registered, all these Criminal Petitions were heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.

3. Facts of the cases lie in a narrow compass

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top