U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Bayya Mahadeva Sastry – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
U.Durga Prasad Rao, J. - The petitioners pray for Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.4 and 5 in issuing the notice dated 13.01.2020 to the 2nd petitioner claiming the subject property near bus stand, Chintha Chettu previously known as Thane House as Gramakantam lying in S.No.240/1 and directing the petitioner to stop the construction of the compound wall as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of provisions of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and for a consequential order to set aside the aforementioned notice issued by the 5th respondent.
2. The petitioners' case is thus:
(a) The petitioners' forefathers purchased a portion of Pachipenta Zamindari Estate and some other properties under two Registered Sale Deeds dated 26.04.1927 and 30.10.1928 and enjoyed the same. Subsequently, the petitioner and his brother succeeded their estate and 1st petitioner being elder brother, managing the properties.
(b) When during the lifetime of their father Bayya Narasimha Sarma, some disputes arose with private parties, their parents filed O.S.No.37 of 1996 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Bobbili for per
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.