SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 482

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
B. Krishna Mohan, J.
Adusumili Chandramohan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11573 of 2020
Decided On : 28-07-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate

Cancellation of registration certificates of motor vehicles without completing the enquiry under Section 55(3) of the MV Act is illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - REGISTRATION OF VEHICLES - CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATES - SHOW CAUSE NOTICE - ENQUIRY - EXPLANATION - CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATES WITHOUT COMPLETING ENQUIRY - VALIDITY - MV ACT, 1988, SECTIONS 55(2), 55(3).

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners challenged the cancellation of registration certificates of their motor vehicles by the 2nd respondent under Section 55(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act). The petitioners contended that the cancellation was illegal as the enquiry contemplated under Section 55(3) of the MV Act was pending and their explanations dated 26.02.2020 were not considered.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the impugned orders of cancellation of registration certificates were liable to be set aside as the enquiry under Section 55(3) of the MV Act was pending and the petitioners' explanations dated 26.02.2020 were not considered. The court directed the 2nd respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders after giving due opportunity to the petitioners.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of registration certificates of the petitioners' motor vehicles without completing the enquiry under Section 55(3) of the MV Act was valid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the cancellation of registration certificates without completing the enquiry under Section 55(3) of the MV Act was illegal and contrary to the provisions of the MV Act and the principles of natural justice. The court relied on its earlier order in Writ Petition No.11599 of 2020, wherein it had set aside a similar impugned order and directed a fresh enquiry.

Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned orders of cancellation of registration certificates and directed the 2nd respondent to complete the enquiry under Section 55(3) of the MV Act and pass appropriate orders after giving due opportunity to the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

B. Krishna Mohan, J. - This Writ Petition is filed challenging the orders of the 2nd respondent in R.No.AP0020509382020, R.No.AP0020509522020, R.No. AP002050932020, R.No.AP0020509362020 and R.No.AP0020509542020, dated 03.06.2020 in cancelling the Registration Certificates of Motor Vehicles bearing Nos.AP02TH4238, AP02TH3854, AP02TH3857, AP02TH3658 and AP02TH3856.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondents.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that the 2nd petitioner is the registered owner of five transport lorries bearing Motor vehicle Nos.AP02TH4238, AP02TH3854, AP02TH3857, AP02TH3658 and AP02TH3856 (for short 'Motor vehicles'). The 1st petitioner is the partner of the said firm of the 2nd petitioner and the notices and cancellation orders issued/passed by the 2nd respondent are in the name of the 1st petitioner. It is the further case of the petitioners that the motor vehicles were purchased on 26.09.2018 and 27.09.2018 from M/s Jatadhara Industries Private Limited for a consideration of Rs.1,43,00,000/- by availing certain loans from Tata Motors Finance solutions limited, Thane West, Maharastra and the 2nd petitioner is a bonafide purchaser of the motor vehicles and the same were purchased after making prudent enquiries and verifying the registration documents. Subsequently, the petitioners made applications under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 (for short 'MV Act') read with Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Rules, 1963 (for short 'MV Rules') and the Central Motor Vehicle Rues, 1989 for transfer of the ownership of the said motor vehicles from their vendor i.e., M/s Jatadhara Industries Private Limited. The 3rd respondent issued Certificates of Fitness for each of the Motor Vehicles and the 2nd respondent had also issued Authorization Certificates for National permit. After completion of the due procedure, the said five motor vehicles were registered in the name of the 2nd petitioner by the 2nd respondent on 26.09.2018 and 27.09.2018. The necessary insurance policies on Motor Vehicles were taken with the National Insurance Company Limited and the Motor vehicle tax is being paid on quarterly basis as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963.

4. It is further contended by the petitioners that the 2nd respondent issued show cause notices, dated 10.02.2020 bearing R.No.38/A1/2020 to the petitioners, which were received on 22.02.2020, to show cause as to why action should not be taken for cancellation of Registration Certificates under Section 55(3) of the MV Act. The petitioners have submitted their explanations to the said show cause notices on 26.02.2020 and the same are pending. They have further requested the 2nd respondent to fix a date for personal hearing for the purpose of making oral submissions by their counsel. As stated, no enquiry is continued or held. But surprisingly, the 2nd respondent issued the impugned orders in R.No.AP0020509382020, R.No.AP0020509522020,R.No.AP002050932020, R.No.AP0020509362020 and R.No.AP0020509542020, dated 03.06.2020, cancelling the Certificate of Registrations of the Motor Vehicles under Section 55(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The relevant extract of one such impugned order is as follows:

    "Sri/Smt Adusumilli Chandramohan registered owner of the vehicle No.AP02TH4238 (Articulated Vehicles) in his/her application cited above has intimated that the above said vehicle became AS THE VEHICLE IS REGISTERED WITH FAKE AND FABRICATED DOCUMENTS. TC IS CANCELLED U/55 OF MV AS PER INSTRUCTIONS OF DTC and submitted the registration certificate of the above vehicle under sub-section (1) of Section 55 of MV Act, 1988.

      In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section 55 of the MV Act, 1988, the certificate of the registration of the vehicle number AP02TH4238 Articulated Vehicles is cancelled AS THE VEHICLE IS REGISTERED WITH FAKE AND FABRICATED DOCU

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top