M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
N. Shankar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J. - This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief:
"..........declaring the action of Respondents more particularly 2nd respondent in rejecting the candidature of petitioner for promotion to the higher rank and issuing impugned proceedings in memo Rc.No.786/F2/2018 dated 05.05.2020 as illegal, high-handed unconstitutional, deliberate, unwarranted, unsustainable, arbitrary against law, as well as principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the proceedings memo R.C No 786/F2/2018 dated 05.05.2020 and direct the Respondents to promote the petitioner for further higher rank with all consequential benefits"
2. The petitioner was appointed as Reserved Sub-Inspector (Armed) on 15.07.2008 and posted as District Armed Reserve Police at Kakinada. While the petitioner was working in Traffic-I Police Station, Kakinada, he was suspended under Rule 8(1) of The Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 (for short 'C.C.A Rules) vide proceedings R.O.546/1 on the ground that Crime No.244 of 2016 was registered against this petitioner under Sections 120-B, 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.