SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 630

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Gogineni Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Gogineni Jogaiah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :C.H. Ramesh Babu, Advocate

ORDER :

M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.

1. This civil revision petition is filed assailing the order in I.A. No. 364 of 2014 in O.S. No. 220 of 2013 dated 21.08.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District.

2. The petitioners filed civil revision petition to reopen the evidence of the plaintiffs and to recall P.W.-1 under Order XVIII Rule 17 of C.P.C. for marking documents. The petitioners are the plaintiffs, whereas, respondents were the defendants in O.S. No. 220 of 2013.

3. The suit was filed for partition of suit schedule property into three equal shares and for allotment of two such shares to the plaintiffs by metes and bounds and for separate possession. The petitioners filed I.A. No. 364 of 2014 on the ground that the defendants took a plea in their written statement that the mother of the petitioners is not the legally wedded wife of the first defendant and the petitioners are illegitimate children of the first defendant and they obtained certified copy of sale deed dated 16.03.1981 executed by P.W.-5 in favour of third defendant in respect of the land covered under Ex. A-8 and voters list in respect of Gottumukkala village. As the evidence of these petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top