SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 639

M.VENKATA RAMANA
Nethinti Appanna – Appellant
Versus
ECE Industries Limited Company – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :O. Manoher Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent: A. Chandra Shaker

JUDGMENT :

M. Venkata Ramana, J.

1. This Civil Miscellaneous appeal is directed against the order dated 21.11.2017 in I.A. No. 1942 of 2015 in O.S. No. 804 of 2015 of the Court of the learned VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Visakhapatnam.

2. Application in I.A. No. 1942 of 2015 in O.S. No. 804 of 2015 was filed for grant of temporary injunction under Order-39, Rules 1 and 2 r/w. Section 94 and Section 151 CPC restraining the appellants and others from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property of the 1st respondent, during pendency of the suit.

3. The 1st respondent instituted the suit to declare four General Powers of Attorney bearing document Nos. 643/2015, 644/2015 and 646/2015 dated 23.02.2015, are vitiated by fraud, invalid/non-est, not binding on the 1st respondent and to grant a permanent injunction restraining the appellants and the 7th defendant from interfering with its peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. A further relief of permanent injunction is sought against the respondents 2 and 3, who are the defendants 9 and 10, from registering any document basing on four General Powers of Attorney referr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top