SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Battu Devanand, J.
Pothuluri Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 16554 of 2007
Decided On : 17-12-2020

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Padmanabha Rao, Advocate
For the Respondent:GP, C. Prakash Reddy, SC, R. Manmadha Reddy and P. Durga Prasad, Advocates

The punishment for misconduct should be proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct.

Headnote:

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE - WITHHOLDING OF INCREMENT - CONDUCT OF EMPLOYEES - APSRTC EMPLOYEES (CONDUCT) REGULATIONS, 1963 - RE-ISSUANCE OF TICKETS - PUNISHMENT - MODIFICATION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Conductor in the respondent Corporation (Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation), filed the present writ petition impugning the Award dated 20.01.2006 in I.D. No. 77 of 2001 passed by the 1st respondent-Labour Court, Guntur (the Labour Court for brevity), confirming the punishment of withholding of two increments with cumulative effect imposed by the 2nd respondent vide order dated 20.01.2006 besides treating the period of suspension as not on duty.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the punishment of withholding of annual increment for a period of two years with cumulative effect was disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct and modified it to "withholding of annual increment for a period of two years without cumulative effect".

Issues: Whether the punishment of withholding of annual increment for a period of two years with cumulative effect was proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the punishment was disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct, considering that the petitioner had not collected the requisite fare amount from the passengers and that the tickets were unserially printed and kept in the ticket block.

Final Decision: The Court partly allowed the writ petition and modified the punishment of withholding of annual increment for a period of two years with cumulative effect to "withholding of annual increment for a period of two years without cumulative effect".

ORDER :

Battu Devanand, J.

1. The petitioner, a Conductor in the respondent Corporation (Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation), filed the present writ petition impugning the Award dated 20.01.2006 in I.D. No. 77 of 2001 passed by the 1st respondent-Labour Court, Guntur (the Labour Court for brevity), confirming the punishment of withholding of two increments with cumulative effect imposed by the 2nd respondent vide order dated 20.01.2006 besides treating the period of suspension as not on duty.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner joined as casual conductor in A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (the 'Corporation' for brevity) in 1999 and later transferred to Governerpet Depot-1. When the petitioner was returning to Railway Station from Vanukuru, at stage No. 9/Penamaluru, a check was held on 23-02-1998. Observing certain irregularities in the ticketing process i.e., while issuing tickets, the petitioner had issued re-issued tickets of Rs. 2/- denomination, which were used in the previous trip at stage No. 11 and accounted in the SR, the Corporation charge sheeted the petitioner. Subsequently, not satisfied with the petitioner's explanation, the Corporation conducted a departmental enquiry, which culminated in the 2nd respondent passing an Order inflicting on the petitioner the major punishment of withholding of two increments with cumulative effect. Aggrieved by the said punishment, he preferred an appeal before the Regional Manager on 18-02-1999 and the same was dismissed confirming the order passed by the disciplinary authority. Aggrieved by the same, he raised an industrial disputes before the Conciliation Officer and the Assistant Commissioner of Labour by APSRTC Staff and Workers Federation. As there was no amicable settlement, the Government referred the dispute to the Labour Court. Thereupon, the Labour Court confirmed the punishment of penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority. Further aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

3. Heard Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Durga Prasad, learned counsel for ASPRTC.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Award of the Labour Court in confirming the order of the disciplinary authority is wholly illegal, arbitrary and without any basis. He further submits that the petitioner has not issued re-issued tickets as alleged in the charge memo and that he issued valid tickets to the passengers and wrong entries have been made in the S.R. due to improper and double printing on the tickets. He further submits that the Labour failed to see that cash has not been counted by the Checking Officials at the time of check. He submits that the labour Court erred in finding that the witness did not admit that the ticket numbers were printed unserially, though in the enquiry, the TTI Sri S.J. Ahmed has stated in the cross examination that printing of ticket numbers were wrongly printed and they were unserial. Finally, he submits that the Labour Court failed to give sufficient reasons while dismissing the case of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 filed Counter while supporting the Order passed by the Labour Court in all aspects. He further submits that at stage No. 9/Penamaluru, a check was exercised by the TTIs on 23.02.1998 at 19.55 hours near Penamaluru X roads and during the check, the checking officials found two passengers were traveling in the bus from Vanukuru to Raghavaiah Park Ex-stages 12 to 3/2 and those two passengers were possessing tickets bearing Nos. 090/132888 to 889 of Rs. 3/- denomination each and 192/783443 to 443 of Rs. 2/- each and that the petitioner collected the requisite fare amount of Rs. 10/- in total from two passengers at Vanukuru itself and that they verified the SR for the account particulars of the said tickets and found that Rs. 2/- denomination tickets were already issued in the earlier trip i.e., 18.10 hours trip at 11th stage as per the SR.

6. He further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top