SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. Praveen Kumar, D. Ramesh, JJ.
Pandillapalli Obula Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P. and Ors. – Respondents
WP (PIL) No. 244 of 2020
Decided On : 14-12-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :J. Venkatram Narsimha Reddy, Advocate

Public interest litigation must be filed with genuine intentions and should not be used to stall government projects.

Headnote:

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 - G.O.RT. NO. 323, DATED 24.06.2020 - G.O.RT. NO. 465, DATED 08.09.2020 - DISBURSEMENT OF SANCTIONED AMOUNT TO PAFS/PDFS - PRIOR DEMOLITION OF HOUSES - FORCED EVACUATION - ARTICLES 14, 19 AND 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - GUIDELINES FOR ENTERTAINMENT.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a PAF/PDF of Thallaproddatur Village, filed a PIL seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse the sanctioned amount pursuant to G.O.Rt. No. 323, dated 24.06.2020, and G.O.Rt. No. 465, dated 08.09.2020, to the PAFs/PDFs of Thallaproddatur Village, under Gandikota Reservoir Project without insisting on prior demolition of their houses, granting minimum six months time for their rehabilitation/resettlement; and declare the 'forced evacuation' by the Respondents by impounding more than 12 TMCs water in Gandikota Reservoir, as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Awards were passed long back, possession being taken and handed over to Executive Engineer, GNSS, Kadapa, which is evident from the Government Orders and Circulars issued and the Petitioner having received Rs. 7.00 lakhs under R&R benefit through CFMs on 28.09.2020, which was credited in his bank account.

Issues: 1. Whether the district administration of Kadapa District is insisting on prior demolition of the houses before disbursement of money to PAFs/PDFs/IDPs? 2. Whether the 'forced evacuation' by the Respondents by impounding more than 12 TMCs water in Gandikota Reservoir is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the plea of the Petitioner that the district administration of Kadapa District, in a high-handed manner are insisting on prior demolition of the houses before disbursement of money to PAFs/PDFs/IDPs, may not be correct, more so, when the material on record show that, after taking possession, the work towards the reservoir has commenced. 2. The court also held that in the absence of any aggrieved persons approaching the court, a doubt arises as to the contents of the PIL, more so, when the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the PIL are doubtful in nature.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the Writ Petition.

ORDER :

C. Praveen Kumar, J.

1. The Writ Petitioner, in this present Public Interest Litigation, seeks issuance of Mandamus to direct the Respondents to disburse the sanctioned amount pursuant to G.O.Rt. No. 323, dated 24.06.2020, and G.O.Rt. No. 465, dated 08.09.2020, to the PAFs/PDFs of Thallaproddatur Village, under Gandikota Reservoir Project without insisting on prior demolition of their houses, granting minimum six months time for their rehabilitation/resettlement; and declare the 'forced evacuation' by the Respondents by impounding more than 12 TMCs water in Gandikota Reservoir, as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional.

2. The averments in the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, show that, the Petitioner is one of the PAFs/PDFs of Thallaproddatur Village, Kondapuram Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, under Gandikota Reservoir Project. The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued District Gazette (extraordinary) Notification vide Reference No. C/R&R/01/2019, dated 26.08.2019, and the name of the Petitioner appeared at Sl. No. 1637 and SES 505 along with 5000 similar others.

3. In the year 2007, the Government of Andhra Pradesh proposed construction of Gandikota Reservoir, which is a part of Galeru-Nagari Sujala Sravanthi, with an estimated storage of flood water to an extent of 26.85 T.M.C., from Krishna River through foreshore area of Srisailam Reservoir, so as to provide irrigation and drinking water facilities to the people in drought hit Kadapa and Chittoor districts.

4. In order to implement the Gandikota Reservoir Phase-II and III, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Rt. No. 323, dated 24.06.2020, for release of an amount of Rs. 522.85 Crores to the effected 7 villages i.e., Thallaproddatur, Chamarlu, Yerragudi, P. Ananthapuram, Eturu, Regadipalli and K. Sugumanchipilli. The II and III Phase of project are part and parcel of Galeru-Nagari Sujala Sravanthi Phase-I for supply of drinking and irrigation water to the Rayalaseema region.

5. Consequently, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Rt. No. 465, dated 08.09.2020, seeking acquisition of land to an extent of Ac. 99.80 cents, situated in Sy. Nos. 5/1, 6, 7, 9/2 etc. of Jogapuram Village of Kondapuram Mandal, for establishment of R&R centre to the displaced families of Thallaproddatur village, under the submergence of Gandikota Reservoir of Galeru-Nagari Sujala Sravanthi Phase-I of package-I.

6. It is averred that, the District administration of Kadapa District, in a high-handed manner are insisting on prior demolition of the houses before disbursement of money to PAFs/PDFs/IDPs. The agitation by the affected villagers in not issuing R&R package lead to filing of a Writ Petition (PIL) No. 183 of 2020. In the said Writ Petition, interim order came to be passed, stating that 'pendency of this writ petition will not prevent the respondents in proceeding with disbursement of the sanctioned amount. However, at the same time, respondents were directed to maintain status quo'.

7. It is further averred that, subsequent to the interim orders passed in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 183 of 2020, the District administration adopted a deceitful way of enforcing evacuation of the oustees by impounding of more than 12 TMCs water, leading to submergence of the villages, which act is more inhumane than direct demolition, and the same is in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Having regard to the above, various reliefs are sought in the Writ Petition, which is filed in the form of Public Interest Litigation.

8. A Counter came to be filed on behalf of 2nd and 5th Respondents, denying the averments made in the affidavit, filed in support of Writ Petition, except those that are specifically admitted therein.

    (i). It is stated, in the counter filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Jammalamadugu, Kadapa District that, as per the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Awards came to be passed, vide Award No. 73/2009-10, 5/2011 and 06/2011 etc., before the year 2012 itse

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top