SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 752

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Parvatam Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.R.S. Srinivas
For the Respondent: Government Pleader

ORDER :

M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed, questioning the proceedings dated 13.1.2020, issued by fourth respondent herein/Tahsildar, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, in respect of an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents out of Acs. 2.93 cents in Sy. No. 294/23 of Arulla Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District, under Section 6 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act (for short 'the Act'), declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.

2. The petitioner is the person in possession of property of an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents in Sy. No. 294/23 of Arulla Village, Tadepallugudem Mandal, West Godavari District, possession of petitioner is not in dispute, because fourth respondent issued notice under Section 7 of the Act and passed order under Section 6 of the Act. According to the petitioner, land in Sy. No. 294/23 is classified as Gramakantam, it is under cultivation by raising paddy crop. As per notice under Section 6 of the Act, when land is classified as Gramakantam, respondents have no authority to exercise power to evict the petitioner, invoking provisions of the Act, by issuing notice under Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top