SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 961

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Amuloju Venkata Papacharyulu – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Neelakanteswara Rao.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners are accused Nos. 2 and 5 of Crime No. 289 of 2018 of Rajahmundry Urban I Town (L&O) Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 406 and 506 Part-II r/w 34 IPC, on 25.08.2018, which was outcome of the private complaint of the 2nd respondent-defacto complainant M. Chandra Rao. The time and date of occurrence alleged in the FIR was 09.01.2015, the private complaint averments in registration of the crime supra pending against 8 accused shows that complainant is doing business in coconut at Rajamahendravaram Stadium Road. He used to visit Markandeyaswamy Temple daily at Rajamahendravaram where A.1 was working as a clerk in the temple. A1 thereby developed acquaintance with complainant which led to their friendship and represented the complainant therefrom that there was vacant site of 132 square yards which belongs to 6 sisters and their mother all known to him lying at Ullithota Street and make the complainant to believe that if same was purchased complainant would get good profits. The complainant informed the A.1 of no such huge amount to invest. A.1 represented that he can give original sale deed relating to the property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top