SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 951

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AKULA VENKATA SESHA SAI, J.
Mohd. Sadiq Shareef – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 15470 of 2017
Decided On : 03-12-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Muddu Vijay.

Opening of Rowdy Sheet against an individual requires strict adherence to relevant provisions and cannot be done in a mechanical or routine manner. It must be based on specific criteria as outlined in Police Standing Order 601.

Headnote:

ROWDY SHEET - OPENING AND CONTINUATION - POLICE STANDING ORDER 601 - Opening of Rowdy Sheet against an individual is an action that affects life and liberty, thus strict adherence to relevant provisions is mandatory. Rowdy Sheet cannot be opened in a mechanical, routine, and cavalier manner.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner challenged the opening and continuation of Rowdy Sheet against him, arguing that it was illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, as well as Police Standing Order 601. He contended that there was only one pending murder case against him and no conviction so far.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that opening a Rowdy Sheet against an individual is an action that affects life and liberty, and thus strict adherence to relevant provisions is mandatory. It referred to its earlier judgment in M. Malla Reddy vs. State of Telangana, emphasizing the need for care and caution in opening Rowdy Sheets due to their impact on fundamental rights.

Issues: 1. Whether the opening and continuation of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner was illegal and arbitrary. 2. Whether the petitioner's involvement in a pending murder case justified the continuation of the Rowdy Sheet.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Police Standing Order 601, which specifies the categories of persons who may be classified as rowdies and against whom Rowdy Sheets may be opened. It noted that the petitioner did not fall under any of these categories and that there was no conviction against him.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioner to submit a representation to the 2nd respondent within two weeks. The respondent was required to verify the representation and take appropriate action in accordance with the law and the court's observations within four weeks.

ORDER :

1. In the present writ petition, challenge is to the opening and continuation of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing for Respondents.

3. It is contended by the learned counsel for petitioner that the questioned action is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides being opposed to the very spirit and object of the Police Standing Order 601. It is the further submission of the learned counsel that in the absence of necessary ingredients of PSO 601, opening of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner cannot be sustained. It is also the submission of the learned counsel that so far there is only one crime registered against the petitioner under Sections 120-B, 302 read with 34 of IPC and the same is pending trial. It is the further submission of the learned counsel that there is no _ conviction so far against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner herein is suffering from various ailments and also underwent cardiac surgery.

4. On the contrary, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that there is absolutely no illegality nor there exists any infirmity in the impugned action and in the absence of the same, the petitioner herein is not entitled for any indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is also the submission of the learned Government Pleader that in view of involvement of the petitioner in a murder case, his activities are required to be watched by continuing the rowdy sheet against him.

5. The opening of Rowdy Sheet against an individual is undoubtedly an action, which affects the life and liberty of an individual. PSO 601 is penal in nature. Therefore, while opening a Rowdy Sheet against an individual, strict adherence to the relevant provisions is mandatory. In this context, it may be appropriate to refer to the judgment of this Court in M. Malla Reddy vs. State of Telangana and Others, 2016 (1) ALD (Crl.) 591. In the said judgment, while dealing with the issue of opening of Rowdy Sheet and the obligation cast upon the police authorities in the said process, this Court at paragraph 10 held as under:

    “Rowdy sheet cannot be opened in a mechanical, routine and cavalier manner and more care and caution and circumspection is required to be observed for opening of the rowdy sheet as the same undoubtedly touches the personal liberty of the citizen and has a considerable impact on the fundamental rights as enshrined under Chapter III of the Constitution of India. The State and its instrumentalities are the custodians of the statutory and constitutional rights of the citizens. Parliament and the State legislature render the laws, keeping in view the betterment and welfare of the people and the parties functioning under the State laws have the holy and sacred obligation to discharge their duties keeping in view the object and intention behind the said laws made by the legislature. Any deviation and breach of the same would render the actions invalid and void. The actions of the authorities should necessarily be in the direction of creating and strengthening the confidence of the people in the system, lest anarchy prevails, which would never be in the interest of the democratic system which is guided by the rule of law. Every action of the authorities should be inconsonance with the basic structure of the Constitution of India which is the dream of the founding fathers of our magna carta. The action which is under challenge in these writ petitions is required to be examined and adjudicated in the light of the above issues.”

6. In this context, it may also be appropriate to refer to Police Standing Order No. 601 and according to the same, the following persons may be classified as Rowdies and Rowdy Sheet may be opened against them:

    “Rowdies

601 The following persons may be classified as rowdies and Rowdy Shee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top