C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
E. K. Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. , Rep by Spl PP. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Appeal is filed against the conviction and sentence imposed in C.C. No. 22 of 2004 on the file of the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad, on 07.11.2008, wherein, the Appellant who was tried for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was convicted and sentenced to suffer Simple Imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three months each under both the counts. The sentence of imprisonment imposed under both the counts were directed to run concurrently.
2. The substance of the Charges against Accused Officer is that, on 09.06.2003 at 1.40 p.m., the Accused Officer in pursuance to his earlier demand is said to have accepted Rs.1,000/-towards illegal gratification as a motive for releasing Earnest Money Deposit and Security Deposit.
3. The facts, as culled out from the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, are as under:
Lalitha Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Others
Mukhtiar Singh (since deceased) through His Legal Representative v. State of Punjab
P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police and Anr.
P. Sirajuddin Etc. v. State of Madras Etc.
Suraj Mal v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.