M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Tatakuntla Ganga Rathnam – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. As the relief claimed in all these three writ petitions is identical, as such, learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents advanced common argument. Hence, I am of the view that it is expedient to decide all these writ petitions by common order.
2. All these writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in effecting transfer of the petitioners from their respective schools in different areas of different districts, as per the transfer schedule issued through proceedings of the respondents, in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.54, School Education (Service. II) Department dated 12.10.2020 issued by the respondents, without taking decision for merger of the said schools into their respective Municipal Corporations/Municipalities/Nagar Panchayats, despite addressing letters by the concerned authorities of Municipal Corporations/Municipalities/Nagar Panchayats to the Commissioner, Department of School Education to give management/control over the schools which are under the cont
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.