IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.
Jupalli Radhika – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 2349 of 2021
Decided On : 03-02-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Appointment orders - Movable and immovable property - Service certificate - In view of proceedings of District Collector in directing Superintendent Government General Hospital Guntur to provide employment to petitioner on contract basis immediately as per provisions of Department fourth respondent/ DMHO Guntur appointed petitioner as second ANM on outsourcing basis vide proceedings under NHM and posted at Sub-Centre of PHC Guntur District - Petitioner is rendering services since as second ANM with all requisite qualification and waited for period of eight months for salaries but not paid and finally petitioner has submitted representations on 21-09-2020 and to third respondent and requested for payment of salaries- But no amount was paid till though she is rendering services as ANM- Therefore petitioner submitted another representation on to Medical Officer PHC and submitted another presentation on to fourth respondent but she was not paid salary and no purpose was served
Finding of court: Therefore non- payment of salary to employees in service is deprivation of a citizen in right to property- Such deprivation is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 and Constitutional Right to property under Article 300-A of Constitution of India and Human Rights of livelihood as per Article 25(1) of Universal Declaration of Human Rights since they would be deprived of their livelihood though they are under obligation to meet different expenses including maintaining their health condition life- Similarly employees are bound to face certain difficulties if salary is not paid for reason that sometimes most of employees would be under obligation to repay housing loans and would be having other financial commitments their regular maintenance besides deduction of income tax and other tax liabilities- If part of amount is appropriated towards those liabilities hardly balance amount which employees would be receiving would not be sufficient for their livelihood - While deciding such an issue Court has to take into consideration common man’s and middle class employee’s lifestyle and decide case in a proper perspective
Result: Writ petition is allowed
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the inaction of the respondents in not paying the salaries to the petitioner basing on the appointment orders issued vide Proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 dated 08.01.2020 in the post of second Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM) by the fourth respondent as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay salary to this petitioner including the arrears from 22.01.2020 as per the appointment order dated 08.01.2020.
2. In view of the proceedings of the District Collector in Rc. No. 553/2019-C3 dated 16.12.2019 directing the Superintendent, Government General Hospital, Guntur to provide employment to the petitioner on contract basis immediately as per the provisions of G.O.Ms. No. 95 SW (CV-POA) Department dated 29.08.2016, the fourth respondent/ DMHO, Guntur appointed the petitioner as second ANM on outsourcing basis vide proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 under NHM and posted at Etukuru Sub-Centre of Katrapadu PHC, Guntur District. The petitioner is rendering services since 22.01.2020 as second ANM with all requisite qualification and waited for period of eight months for salaries, but not paid and finally the petitioner has submitted representations on 21.09.2020 and 07.12.2020 to the third respondent and requested for payment of salaries. But, no amount was paid till date, though she is rendering services as ANM. Therefore, the petitioner submitted another representation on 07.12.2020 to the Medical Officer, PHC Katrapadu and submitted another presentation on 08.01.2021 to the fourth respondent, but she was not paid salary and no purpose was served. Therefore, the petitioner herein approached this Court to issue a direction to the second respondent to pay salary for the services she rendered as an employee in terms of the appointment orders issued vide Proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 dated 08.01.2020.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Services placed on record, written instructions Rc. No. HMF-04-11021(32)/16/2020-EST-SEC-CHFW dated 03.02.2021 admitting about issue of directions to appoint Smt. Jupalli Radhika W/o Pedda Hanumaiah and Mother of Kum. J. Lavanya (aged 05 years) as per Serial No. 6 of Government in Circular Memo No. 627352/CV-POA Social Welfare Department dated 10.10.2020 read with G.O. No. 95 Social Welfare (CV-POA) Department dated 29.08.2016. On the strength of the same, learned Government Pleader for Services contended that, in the absence of any service certificate, she is not entitled and requested to pass appropriate orders.
4. Appointment of this petitioner on outsourcing basis as second ANM is not in dispute, but discharge of duties by the petitioner for the last eight months is disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Services-III. However, the petitioner obtained Service Certificate dated 18.01.2021 from Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Katrapadu, Guntur District, certifying that the petitioner is working as second ANM Sub-Centre Etukuru, Primary Health Centre Katrapadu since 22.01.2020 till 18.01.2021. Therefore, the certificate issued by the Medical Officer is suffice to conclude that the petitioner is discharging her duties as second ANM, since the date of her appointment i.e. appointment orders issued vide Proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 dated 08.01.2020. Based on this certificate, the petitioner is deemed to have been discharging her duties as second ANM. As long as the petitioner is rendering service in terms of appointment orders issued, vide Proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 dated 08.01.2020, she is entitled to claim the salary payable to her as per the appointment orders issued, vide, Proceedings Rc. No. 3884/E3/2019 dated 08.01.2020. But, non payment of salaries amounts to depriving this petitioner to livelihood and it is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
5. The word ‘salary’ is not defined in any enactment, but salary is a fixed regular payment, typically p
Delhi Transport Corporation vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Madhav Rao Scindia vs. State of M.P. AIR 1961 SC 298
Madhav Rao Scindia vs. Union of India
M. Paul Anthony vs. Bharat Gold Mines Limited
Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
Shapoor M. Mehra vs. Allahabad Bank
Siddhi Bala Bose Library Association vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.