ORDER :

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the action of the respondents in not considering the representation, dated 26.09.2009 of the petitioner for providing compassionate appointment.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

3. Heard Sri K. Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. N. Anula, learned Standing counsel for respondent University.

4. The case of the petitioner is that while his mother working as Agricultural Workmen in the 2nd respondent organization died on 19.03.2009 in harness. Being the petitioner is the dependent and only legal heir to the deceased employee, he submitted a representation on 26.09.2009 requesting to appoint him in any suitable post on compassionate grounds. As his claim was not considered, he filed the present writ petition against the in action of the respondents.

5. On the other hand, the case of the respondents is that the contention of the petitioner that he submitted a representation on 26.09.2009 for appointment on compassionate grounds is false and only on 17.04.2010 he submitted representation to the 1st respondent. As per the existing