IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D.V.S.S.Somayajulu, J.
M/s Oil Palm Developers and Processors Association, and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and ors. – Respondents
W.P.No. 2043 of 2021
Decided On : 23-04-2021
Andhra Pradesh Oil Palm Act, 1993 - section 13 - Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19 - – Power to fix prices - Fixation of price by the State for the Oil Palm Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) from which palm oil is extracted In addition section 11 of Act states that State Government shall have power to declare a particular area as factory zone for purpose of supply of fresh oil palm fruit bunches to factories - Under section 11 Act once a factory zone is established, all the farmers of that area shall supply their fruit bunches from their plantations to the factory - Factory is also under an obligation to buy oil palm fresh fruit bunches - There is no dispute about this position Act –
Finding of the Court:
Issue before the learned single Judge was about price fixation for present case is on a different footing altogether - After this judgment was pronounced in there were meetings wherein a solution was sought to be arrived at by getting same bunches processed at both units in Andhra - This was the consensus evolved - Processing was only possible at and vice versa was not possible. These facts make a fundamental difference to the applicability of learned Single Judge’s decision to the present case - A difference in one fact can also make a difference in applicability of a decision to subsequent cases - Apart from this it is also clear that this judgment of learned single Judge is under challenge –
Resul:Petition dismissed
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed for the following reliefs :
2. This Court has heard Sri B.Adinarayana Rao, learned senior counsel for Sri Challa Guna Ranjan, the Government Pleader for Agriculture appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Additional Solicitor General for respondent No.4 and Sri M.S.Prasad, senior counsel for the unofficial respondents.
3. The issue in this case relates to the fixation of price by the State for the Oil Palm Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) from which palm oil is extracted. The following facts are not in dispute: (1) The relevant statue applicable to the facts of the case is the Andhra Pradesh Oil Palm (Regulation of Production and Processing) Act, 1993 (for short ‘the Act’). In this Act, section 13 is the important for this case. The two clauses of section 13 of the Act are reproduced hereunder:
(1) The Government may on their own fix the minimum price of Oil Palm FFBs or may authorize the Oil Palm Commissioner to do so, subject to such guidelines as they may give in that regard from time to time.
(2) Where the Oil Palm Commissioner is authorized to fix the prices of Oil Palm FFBs to be purchased by the factory, he shall declare at such intervals as may be directed by the Government the minimum price at which the Oil Palm FFBs be purchased by the factories.
4. In addition, section 11 of the Act states that the State Government shall have the power to declare a particular area as the factory zone for the purpose of supply of fresh oil palm fruit bunches to the factories. Under section 11(2) of the Act, once a factory zone is established, all the farmers (oil palm growers) of that area shall supply their fruit bunches from their plantations to the factory. The factory is also under an obligation to buy the oil palm fresh fruit bunches. There is no dispute about this position vis a vis the Act.
(3) The Government of India has also clarified by letter dated 07.12.2014 that the State Government is free to determine the price and take its own independent decisions basing on their own formula also. Even after the present writ petition is filed, the Government of India clarified that its formula is purely recommendatory in nature and that the State/Government of Andhra Pradesh must take its own decision whether to follow the recommendations or to evolve their own formula.
5. Apart from this, the law on the subject with regard to price fixation is also very clear. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd., v. Union of India, 1990 (3) SCC 223 held as follows in para 45:
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd., v. Union of India
Pallavi Refractories v. Singareni Collieries Company Limited
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.