LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Sayana Sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
Muthyalamma Temple Committee – Respondent
ORDER :
The present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed aggrieved by the order dated 20.01.2017 passed in I.A.No.165 of 2016 in O.S.No.343 of 2015 by Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, wherein the petition filed by third party under Order I Rule 10 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘C.P.C.’) for impleading himself as defendant No.2 in O.S.No.343 of 2015 was allowed.
2. The brief facts of the case are:
The petitioners/plaintiffs have filed the suit in O.S.No.343 of 2015 against respondent No.2/defendant seeking the relief of permanent injunction as respondent No.2/defendant has been trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property. On coming to know about the same, respondent No.1 herein who is proposed party filed an application under Order I Rule 10 and Section 151 of C.P.C. with a prayer to implead Muthyalamma Temple Committee represented by its President as defendant No.2 alleging that the plaint A and B schedule properties belong to Muthyalamma Temple and plaint A schedule property consists of two rooms which were being used by the family of poojari. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.