IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M.Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.19772 Of 2020
Decided On : 24-03-2021
Constitution of India, Article 226 - Declaring the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent herein suspending the Form-B licence issued in favour petitioner for distributing the Gas Cylinders through M/s Royal Gas Agency under the provisions A P Petroleum Products Licensing and Regulation of Supplies Order 1980 is illegal arbitrary unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 19g of Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the proceedings
Finding of the Court:
in the absence of initiation of any disciplinary proceedings and producing any material to substantiate that such contention of initiating disciplinary action against this petitioner in terms of Clause 20 of the Control Order, 2018, the order impugned in the writ petition can be said to be an order passed in the proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, which is limited to order confiscation of essential commodities seized during inspection and it does not confer any power on the enquiring authority to cancel or suspend the license for violation of the regulations referred above. Hence, the order passed by the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(g) of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the same is liable to be set-aside.
Result: Writ petition allowed
ORDER:
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. The petitioner -M/s. Royal Gas Company obtained gas agency from M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited is running the said agency from 28.05.1984 by obtaining permissions from competent authorities from time to time.
3. While so, on 14.10.2020, the fifth respondent/Civil Supplies Deputy Tahsildar (CSDT) along with the officials of Vigilance & Enforcement, Guntur conducted surprise inspection of the petitioner gas agency and found the following variations.
| Sl. No | Description | Domestic LPG cylinders | Commercial LPG cylinders | 5 kgs capacity commercial cylinders | Regulators | ||||
| Full | Empty | Full | Empty | Full | Empty | Sound | defective | ||
| 1 | As per Register | 860 | 42 | 380 | 176 | 329 | 7 | 399 | 102 |
| 2 | Ground Stocks | 826 | 70 | 370 10 Issued | 172 | 329 | 7 | 399 | 102 |
|
| Variation | (-)34 | (+)28 | NIL | (-4) | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL |
4. Though the petitioner explained to the 5th respondent with details of stocks available in the gas agency, the 5th respondent seized the available ground stock of LPG cylinders worth Rs.11,09,087/-from the gas agency and handed over the same to one Sri B.R.S Reddy, Proprietor of M/s. Rama Krishna HP Gas Agency for temporary custody and filed a report under Section 6-A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 before the District Collector, Guntur to confiscate the entire seized stock to the Government and also the 5th respondent herein/CSDT, Guntur submitted a report to the District Collector to initiate necessary disciplinary action against the petitioner for the alleged irregularities.
5. Further, basing on the report of the 5th respondent herein/CSDT, Guntur, the third respondent/Joint Collector & Additional District Magistrate issued proceedings vide Rc.No.591/2020-S8 dated 16.10.2020 suspending Form-B license issued in the name of this petitioner, during pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, directing him to submit his written explanation for the charges levelled against him in the said notice. Questioning the said proceedings Rc.No.591/2020-S8 dated 16.10.2020, the present writ petition is filed requesting to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and with a consequential direction to set-aside the same.
6. The third respondent filed counter affidavit, denying material allegations inter-alia contending that, since the petitioner violated the license conditions, a report was submitted for taking disciplinary action during pendency of the disciplinary proceedings and Form-B license of the petitioner’s agency was suspended not under Section 6-A proceedings. Therefore, there is no irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the respondents and requested to dismiss the writ petition.
7. During hearing, Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, when the supply boys went out for delivering cylinders to the customers, even without waiting for their return, report was prepared and the report did not disclose the exact details. However, as seen from the show cause notice issued to this petitioner, it is clear that, it was issued in the proceedings initiated under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.