SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J.
Pecheti Ranga Rao, S/o. Late Subbarayudu & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Petition No.5162 of 2021
Decided on : 01-11-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ghanta Sridhar.
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor AP.

Point of Law: Section 3(1)(r) of the SC and ST Act makes it manifest that mere insult or intimidation with an intention to humiliate a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe by itself is not made an offence. Only when the said insult or intimidation is made in any place within the public view, then only it was made an offence.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(1Hs) - Quash of charge sheet - De facto - Saving of inherent power of High court – Whether abuse is made within public view as required under Section of law, no offence is made out for offence punishable under Section of law – Whether Allegations set out in F.I.R or in charge sheet constitute any offence against petitioners for offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC and ST Act for which they are being prosecuted now in trial Court.

Finding of the Court :

The ratio laid in judgment of Court squarely applies to present facts of case - It is alleged that A-1 while talking to A-3 over phone abused de facto complainant in name of caste - As alleged abuse is not made within public view as required under Section of law, no offence is made out for offence punishable under Section of law - Allegations set out in F.I.R or in charge sheet do not constitute any offence against petitioners for offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC and ST Act for which they are being prosecuted now in trial Court - Allowing criminal proceedings launched against petitioners to be continued in said facts and circumstances of case would amount to abuse of process of Court

Result: Criminal Petition stand closed.

ORDER:

1. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) is filed seeking quash of charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2021 on the file of the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Special Court for S.C and S.T Atrocities Cases, Eluru, West Godavari District.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent/ State. Notice issued to the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant returned with endorsement ‘item returned refused’. Therefore, it is evident that despite service of notice, the 2nd respondent did not turn up for hearing in this Criminal Petition.

3. The petitioners are A-1 to A-3 in Spl.S.C.No.15 of 2021 on the file of the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Special Court for S.C and S.T Atrocities Cases, Eluru, West Godavari District. The 2nd respondent, who is the de facto complainant, lodged a report with police stating that he belongs to Scheduled Caste and on 12.12.2018 that his marriage with the daughter of A-1 and A-2 was performed and it was an inter-caste marriage. The third accused is the son of A-1 and A-2 and A-1 to A-3 belong to BC-B caste. It is stated that the petitioners, who are A-1 to A-3, have harassed the de facto complainant from the inception of the marriage saying that the de facto complainant belongs to an inferior community. It is stated that on several occasions, the petitioners have insulted the de facto complainant in the name of his caste. According to the de facto complainant the incidents took place inside house. The said report lodged by the de facto complainant was initially registered as a case in Crime 246 of 2019 of Mummidivaram Police Station, East Godavari District, for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “SC and ST Act”), which was subsequently transferred to Eluru II Town Police Station. Eventually after completion of investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed the charge sheet in the trial Court. The said case is now pending before the trial Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that even as per the allegations set out in the F.I.R, the alleged insult said to have been made by the petitioners against the de facto complainant in the name of his caste took place only within the four corners of the house and it has not taken place in public view and as such the facts of the case do not constitute any offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Act. Therefore, he would pray for quash of the charge sheet filed against the petitioners. In support of his contention, he relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Hitesh Verma V. the State of Uttarakhand, (2020) 10 SCC 710 wherein it is held that insult made in the name of the caste which is not in the public view do not constitute any such offence under the provisions of the SC and ST Act.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the Criminal Petition. He would submit that there are clear allegations in the F.I.R to show that the petitioners have several times insulted the de facto complainant in the name of his caste and the said allegations clearly constitute an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC and ST Act.

6. In order to appreciate the above rival contentions of both the parties, it is apposite to extract Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC and ST Act for which the petitioners are being prosecuted and they are read as follows:

    Section 3(1)(r):

Intentionally insults or intimidates with intent to humiliate a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe in any place within public view;

Section 3(1)(s):

abuses any member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe by caste name in any place within public view;

7. A reading of above Section 3(1)(r) of the SC and ST Act makes it manifest that mere insult or intimidatio

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top