SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 347

LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Abhishek – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Hemanth Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Lalitha Kanneganti, J. - This petition is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") seeking pre arrest bail by the petitioner/Accused in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.639 of 2021 of Patamata police station, Vijayawada, Krishna District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 506 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "I.P.C.").

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the petitioner/Accused and the defacto complainant fell in love in the year, 2015 and the petitioner told her to wait for 2 or 3 years for marriage. But he married another girl on 12.07.2021 without informing to the defacto complainant, thereby he cheated her.

3. Heard Sri V.Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged and he has been falsely implicated in the case.

5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that as per the allegations in the complaint, crime has been registered for the offences under S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top