ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Battu Devanand, J.
Goli Sarath Babu @ Sarath Reddy - Appellant
Versus
T. Srinivasa Rao - Respondent
Contempt Case No. 432 of 2021; W.P. No. 3609 of 2021
Decided On : 10-08-2021
CONTEMPT OF COURT - VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER - G.O.MS.NO.171 M.A., DATED 01.05.2004 - TRANSPORTATION OF TEAK TIMBER - VANA SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 - SUMMARY: The court held the 2nd respondent guilty of contempt of court for violating its order dated 15.02.2021, which restrained the respondents from executing the work mentioned in the tender notification dated 12.01.2021 for transportation of teak timber. The court found that the 2nd respondent, with an intention to defeat the order, immediately cancelled the tender notification and executed the work with some third parties, and then tried to escape from the contempt of court by contending that the work was executed by the Vana Samrakshana Samithi Members, Orinka. The court rejected this contention, holding that the duties and responsibilities of Vana Samrakshana Samithi, as provided in G.O.Ms.No.13, Environment Forest Science & Technology (FOR.III) Department, dated 12.02.2002, do not include extraction and transportation of teak timber.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the action of the respondents in executing the work of transportation of teak timber by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 without opening the finance bid of the petitioner towards the tender notification. The court passed an interim order on 15.02.2021, directing the respondents not to execute the work with anybody for the works mentioned in the tender notification, dated 12.01.2021, till finalization of the tender process. The petitioner filed a contempt case, alleging that the respondents violated the court's order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the 2nd respondent violated the court's order dated 15.02.2021 by immediately cancelling the tender notification and executing the work with some third parties. The court rejected the 2nd respondent's contention that the work was executed by the Vana Samrakshana Samithi Members, Orinka, holding that the duties and responsibilities of Vana Samrakshana Samithi do not include extraction and transportation of teak timber.
Issues: Whether the 2nd respondent violated the court's order dated 15.02.2021.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the 2nd respondent violated the court's order dated 15.02.2021 by immediately cancelling the tender notification and executing the work with some third parties. The court rejected the 2nd respondent's contention that the work was executed by the Vana Samrakshana Samithi Members, Orinka, holding that the duties and responsibilities of Vana Samrakshana Samithi do not include extraction and transportation of teak timber.
Final Decision: The court held the 2nd respondent guilty of contempt of court and sentenced her to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of two (02) months and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only), in default, she shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one week.
JUDGMENT
Battu Devanand, J. - This Contempt Case has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for violation of the orders, dated 15.02.2021 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.3609 of 2021.
2. The petitioner filed W.P.No.3609 of 2021 praying to declare the action of the respondents in executing the work by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 is against G.O.Ms.No.171 M.A., dated 01.05.2004 and without opening the finance bid of petitioner towards the tender notification in proceedings Rc.No.1469/2020/S4(II), dated 12.01.2021 for transportation of Teak timber (Final Harvesting) I 1967 TP Kovvada RF-II, Kotrupalli Beat of P.R.Gudem Section of Kannapuram Range, West Godavari District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner filed an Interlocutory Application with a prayer to direct the respondents to stop the work made by respondent Nos.2 and 3, henchmen and followers against tender notification vide proceedings Rc.No.1469/2020/S4(II), dated 12.01.2021 for transportation of Teak timber (Final Harvesting) I 1967 TP Kovvada RF-II, Kotrupalli Beat of P.R.Gudem Section of Kannapuram Range, West Godavari District, to open the commercial bid of the petitioner to finalize the tender notification.
4. The writ petition came up for admission before the Court on 15.02.2021. After hearing both sides counsel the following order is passed:
It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that due to Panchayat Elections, the tender process was not completed yet.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are executing the work through their henchmen and followers against the work mentioned in the tender notification dated 12.01.2021.
Having considered the submissions of both the counsel, in the opinion of this Court, this is a fit case to grant interim direction to the respondents.
Accordingly, there shall be an interim direction to the respondents not to execute the work with anybody for the works which were mentioned in the tender notification, dated 12.01.2021, till finalization of the tender process."
5. Complaining that the respondents violated the orders of the Court, dated 15.02.2021, the present contempt case is filed.
6. The respondents filed their counter-affidavits.
7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and perused the entire material available on record.
8. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and upon perusal of the averments made in the reply filed by the 1st respondent, this Court opined that there is no any role on the part of the 1st respondent in implementing or violating the orders of this Court, dated 15.02.2021 and accordingly, by order, dated 30.03.2021, the contempt case is closed against the 1st respondent.
9. The 2nd respondent filed reply affidavit and subsequently an additional affidavit also filed. In the reply affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent in the month of March, 2021 at para No.5, it is contended as extracted hereunder:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.