SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 366

R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Siddantham Ramanjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R Raghunandan Rao, J. - In all these writ petitions, the issues raised by the petitioners are similar and can be disposed of by a common order.

2. Brief facts, in all these writ petitions, are as follows:

    In the course of certain enquiries, it had come to the light that commercial vehicles having BS-III emission standards, registered in other states, which had initially been declared as scrap, were again registered in the State of Andhra Pradesh, by production of fabricated documents showing as if these vehicles have BS-IV emission standards. After obtaining such registration certificates, it appears that the persons, who had obtained such registration certificates, by utilizing fabricated documents, had sold the said vehicles to innocent purchasers. It appears that 154 such vehicles had been sold to various purchasers in and around the State of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioners, in all these cases, are such purchasers of commercial vehicles including heavy goods carriage vehicles. The vehicles purchased by the petitioners were seized at different places, at different poi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top