SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 426

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Lalitha Kanneganti, J.
Tappal Chitti Babu - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 3673 of 2021
Decided On : 14-07-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Raja Reddy Koneti, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the small quantity of contraband seized and the prolonged incarceration of the petitioners were influential factors in granting bail under the NDPS Act.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Bail - The court granted bail to the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 in connection with a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, considering the small quantity of contraband seized and the petitioners' prolonged incarceration.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were seeking regular bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under the NDPS Act. The police had detained the petitioners and others on suspicion of illegal transportation of ganja and subsequently arrested them based on a mediators report.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the small quantity of contraband seized did not attract the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and considered the petitioners' prolonged incarceration since their arrest on 21.06.2021. Consequently, the court granted bail to the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 on certain conditions.

Issues: The issues involved the alleged false implication of the petitioners, failure of police to follow the procedure under Section 52(A) of the NDPS Act, and the applicability of the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act due to the small quantity of contraband seized.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly the determination that the small quantity of contraband seized did not attract the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the consideration of the petitioners' prolonged incarceration.

Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was allowed, and the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 were granted bail in the case on certain conditions, including executing self bonds and appearing before the Station House Officer once a week.

JUDGMENT

Lalitha Kanneganti, J. - This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking regular bail to the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 in connection with Crime No.133 of 2021, of Puthalapattu Police Station, Chittoor District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity "NDPS Act").

2. The case of prosecution is that on 21.06.2021 on credible information about illegal transportation of ganja, the respondent police along with staff and mediators went to Venganapalle Village Southern side of Near River Bridge situated on Chittoor - Tirupati National Highway and found the petitioners along with another accused on three motorcycles and on suspicion they detained them. On interrogation, A-1 to A-4 confessed that they possessed 6 KGs of ganja and they brought the same from A-5 to A-8 and they have been distributing the same to various places with the assistance of A-9 to A-18. Police seized the contraband and arrested the accused under the cover of mediators report. Basing on the said mediators report, the present crime was registered and sent the accused to judicial custody.

3. Heard Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and police failed to follow the procedure under Section 52(A) of the NDPS Act. Further as per the mediators report, the police recovered only ganja leaves and it is only one KG which is a small quantity, as such, bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted. The petitioners were arrested on 21.06.2021 and since then they have been languishing in jail.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is pending.

6. Taking into consideration the fact that the contraband that is seized from the petitioners is small quantity as such, bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not attracted and further petitioners are languishing in jail from 21.06.2021, this Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners, on certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioners/A-1 to A-3 shall be enlarged on bail in Crime No.133 of 2021 of Puthalapattu Police Station, Chittoor District on their executing self bonds for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Court of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor. On such release, the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 shall appear before the Station House Officer, Puthalapattu Police Station, Chittoor District once in a week between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM, till filing of charge sheet.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top