SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 442

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
B. Vimala Adilakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos.4 and 5 in not registering the sale deed with respect to 18.66 sq yards site and RCC roof building bearing No.53-33-9/B Assessment No. 41368/B 1st floor, (30x15.5) 465 Sq.ft property only, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive and registered the document.

2. Brief facts of the case are that, originally house site admeasuring 56 sq.yds belong to one V. Maraiah. The said land was zeroythi land in Patta No.240, Sy.No.6. The said land was purchased by K. Rami Naidu, his brothers and sons in the year 1971. K. Rami Naidu and his brothers sold the property to one Gujju Papamma under registered sale deed bearing Document No.647/1975 dated 22.01.1975 registered in the office of Joint SubRegistrar, Visakhapatnam. Gujju Papamma partitioned the land between her sons Gujju Nageswara Reddy and Gujju Ramana Murthy under registered partition deed bearing Document No.4558 of 2004 dated 19.10.2004.

3. Since then, sons of Gujju Papamma are enjoying their respective shares in the land. Subsequently, Gujju Ramana

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top