ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Arup Kumar Goswami, C. Praveen Kumar, JJ.
District Collector, Chittoor & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
V. Rangappa (Died) - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 1036 of 2012
Decided On : 07-07-2021
LAND DISPUTE - INAM LAND VS KALAVA PORAM BOKE - CLASSIFICATION - GAZETTE NOTIFICATION - REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER - COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS - FACTUAL DISPUTE - REMAND - [AP (ANDHRA AREA) INAMS (ABOLITION AND CONVERSION INTO RYOTWARI) ACT, 1956]
Fact of the Case:
Dispute over the classification of land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village, Chittoor District, as either inam land or kalava poramboke. The land was initially declared as kalava poramboke in a gazette notification in 1984, but a subsequent decision by the Inam Deputy Tahsildar in 1985 declared it as inam land. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Commissioner of Appeals later set aside the 1985 decision and confirmed the 1984 notification.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Commissioner of Appeals had relied on certain documents that were not before the Revenue Divisional Officer when the land was declared as kalava poramboke. The court also noted that the gazette notification of 1984 was never challenged, and that the subsequent decision of the Inam Deputy Tahsildar in 1985 was inconsistent with the 1984 notification.
Issues: 1. Whether the land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village is inam land or kalava poramboke? 2. Whether the Commissioner of Appeals erred in setting aside the 1985 decision of the Inam Deputy Tahsildar and confirming the 1984 gazette notification?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the matter required reconsideration by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi, in light of the documents relied upon by the appellate authority and the legal issues involved. The court noted that the dispute involved not only disputed factual aspects but also the issuance of two inconsistent gazette notifications based on factual aspects.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ appeal, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and remanded the matter back to the Revenue Divisional Office, Tirupathi, for fresh consideration.
JUDGMENT
C. Praveen Kumar, J. - Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19087 of 2005, dated 27.01.2011, the District Collector, Chittoor, preferred the present Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act.
2. The facts, which lead to filing of the Writ Appeal, are as under :
ii) After the amendment to A.P. Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, Section 2A came to be introduced notifying the communal porambokes. After completion of Survey and Settlement Operations by the Survey Department, the Inams Deputy Tahsildar, Chittoor suo motu conducted enquiry under Section 3(1) of the said Act and passed an order under Section 3(3) declaring lands as imams lands located in Tiruchanur Inam Village and that the lands not held by institution and the communal lands was brought under Section 2A of the Act. This decision of Inams Deputy Tahsildar was got published in Chittoor District Gazette Extraordinary No.09, dated 03.09.1984, in which the subject land was notified as 'Kalava Poramboke'. It appears that the gazette notification, wherein the subject lands were notified as "Kalava Poramboke', was never challenged and the same has attained finality.
iii) During verification of the records and the inspections conducted by the Task Force it has come to light that the lands which were classified as 'Kalava Poramboke' in Sy.No.378/2, ryotwari pattas were granted by the Inams Deputy Tahsildar under Section 7 (1) of Inams Abolition Act, treating the lands as inam lands. The enquiry by the task force revealed that the very same Inams Deputy Tahsildar, who rendered decision declaring the land in Sy.No.378/2, an extent of Ac.4.50 cents of land in Tiruchanur Village as 'Kalava Poramboke', took up an enquiry under Section 3(1) of the Inams Abolition Act and declared the land as Inam Dry and the decision under Section 3(3) of the Act was published in Chittoor District Gazette Extraordinary, dated 09.08.1985.
iv) The dispute now relates to land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village admeasuring Ac.6.47 cents which correlates to paimash No.1115. Being satisfied with the documentary evidence filed by the applicants, Inam Deputy Tahsildar, Chittoor issued ryotwari patta in respect of land admeasuring Ac.4.50 cents in Sy.No.378/2 part, west of Tiruchanur Village under Section 4 of the Inams Abo
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.