SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 448

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Arup Kumar Goswami, C. Praveen Kumar, JJ.
District Collector, Chittoor & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
V. Rangappa (Died) - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 1036 of 2012
Decided On : 07-07-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Syed Khader Mastan, Advocate, K. Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate

When a gazette notification is issued declaring the classification of land, and a subsequent decision is made by a lower authority that is inconsistent with the notification, the matter requires reconsideration by a higher authority in light of all the relevant documents and legal issues involved.

Headnote:

LAND DISPUTE - INAM LAND VS KALAVA PORAM BOKE - CLASSIFICATION - GAZETTE NOTIFICATION - REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER - COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS - FACTUAL DISPUTE - REMAND - [AP (ANDHRA AREA) INAMS (ABOLITION AND CONVERSION INTO RYOTWARI) ACT, 1956]

Fact of the Case:

Dispute over the classification of land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village, Chittoor District, as either inam land or kalava poramboke. The land was initially declared as kalava poramboke in a gazette notification in 1984, but a subsequent decision by the Inam Deputy Tahsildar in 1985 declared it as inam land. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Commissioner of Appeals later set aside the 1985 decision and confirmed the 1984 notification.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Commissioner of Appeals had relied on certain documents that were not before the Revenue Divisional Officer when the land was declared as kalava poramboke. The court also noted that the gazette notification of 1984 was never challenged, and that the subsequent decision of the Inam Deputy Tahsildar in 1985 was inconsistent with the 1984 notification.

Issues: 1. Whether the land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village is inam land or kalava poramboke? 2. Whether the Commissioner of Appeals erred in setting aside the 1985 decision of the Inam Deputy Tahsildar and confirming the 1984 gazette notification?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the matter required reconsideration by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi, in light of the documents relied upon by the appellate authority and the legal issues involved. The court noted that the dispute involved not only disputed factual aspects but also the issuance of two inconsistent gazette notifications based on factual aspects.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ appeal, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and remanded the matter back to the Revenue Divisional Office, Tirupathi, for fresh consideration.

JUDGMENT

C. Praveen Kumar, J. - Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19087 of 2005, dated 27.01.2011, the District Collector, Chittoor, preferred the present Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act.

2. The facts, which lead to filing of the Writ Appeal, are as under :

    i) The Tiruchanur Village in Tirupati Rural Mandal was declared as a minor inam village under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 (hereinafter called as, 'Inams Abolition Act, 1956'). Pursuant thereto, the lands in the inam village stand vested with the Government, free from encumbrances, except in respect of lands in which the inamdars are entitled for a patta. The Inam Deputy Tahsildar, Srikalahasthi, took up suo motu enquiry of regularization of inam lands in Tiruchanur Village, covered under title deed No.464 under the Inams Abolition Act, 1956 and accordingly issued notice under Section 3(1) of the said Act, to find out as to (1) whether the lands are inam lands or ryotwari lands; (2) whether the said lands are located in inam village or ryotwari village and also as to (3) whether the said lands are held by any institution. After due enquiry, an order came to be passed under Sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the Andhra Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, declaring the lands as (i)inam lands, (ii) are in an Inam Village, and (iii) are held by an institution. The said decision was published in Chittoor District gazette extraordinary, dated 24.03.1963. In the gazette, the ryoti lands covered under paimoish numbers were not notified as the rights on covered land vest with the government. Further, in pre-abolition records, such as No.2 Adangal, for the Fasli 1361, 1362, 1372, Fair Land Register, Rough Fair Adangal, Correlation Register, the said Paimash No.1115, which was described as poramboke land was noted as 'Kotramangalam Kalva'.

ii) After the amendment to A.P. Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, Section 2A came to be introduced notifying the communal porambokes. After completion of Survey and Settlement Operations by the Survey Department, the Inams Deputy Tahsildar, Chittoor suo motu conducted enquiry under Section 3(1) of the said Act and passed an order under Section 3(3) declaring lands as imams lands located in Tiruchanur Inam Village and that the lands not held by institution and the communal lands was brought under Section 2A of the Act. This decision of Inams Deputy Tahsildar was got published in Chittoor District Gazette Extraordinary No.09, dated 03.09.1984, in which the subject land was notified as 'Kalava Poramboke'. It appears that the gazette notification, wherein the subject lands were notified as "Kalava Poramboke', was never challenged and the same has attained finality.

iii) During verification of the records and the inspections conducted by the Task Force it has come to light that the lands which were classified as 'Kalava Poramboke' in Sy.No.378/2, ryotwari pattas were granted by the Inams Deputy Tahsildar under Section 7 (1) of Inams Abolition Act, treating the lands as inam lands. The enquiry by the task force revealed that the very same Inams Deputy Tahsildar, who rendered decision declaring the land in Sy.No.378/2, an extent of Ac.4.50 cents of land in Tiruchanur Village as 'Kalava Poramboke', took up an enquiry under Section 3(1) of the Inams Abolition Act and declared the land as Inam Dry and the decision under Section 3(3) of the Act was published in Chittoor District Gazette Extraordinary, dated 09.08.1985.

iv) The dispute now relates to land in Sy.No.378/2 of Tiruchanur Village admeasuring Ac.6.47 cents which correlates to paimash No.1115. Being satisfied with the documentary evidence filed by the applicants, Inam Deputy Tahsildar, Chittoor issued ryotwari patta in respect of land admeasuring Ac.4.50 cents in Sy.No.378/2 part, west of Tiruchanur Village under Section 4 of the Inams Abo

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          Judicial Analysis

          AI

          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top