SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 449

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, B.KRISHNA MOHAN
Bommu Prasanth @ Prasanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor, Hyd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Srinivas, Advocate, S. Dushyanth Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

C.Praveen Kumar, J. - Heard Sri. K. Srinivas, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Sri. S. Dushyanth Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, through Blue Jeans video conferencing APP and with their consent, the appeal is disposed of.

    1 Accused No. 1 in Sessions Case No. 183 of 2011 on the file of V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur, is the appellant herein. Originally, Accused Nos. 1 to 5 were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ['I.P.C.']. By its Judgment, dated 02.06.2015, the learned Sessions Judge, while acquitting Accused No. 2 to 5 of all charges, convicted Accused No. 1 for the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. He was also found convicted for the offence punishable under Section 201 I.P.C., and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. However, Accused No. 1 was acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top