ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
R. Raghunandan Rao, J.
Yelika Srinivasulu - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
W.P. No. 19149 of 2020
Decided On : 06-07-2021
LANDLESS POOR PERSONS - STATUS - REVIEW - PROVISO TO RULE 3(3) OF ANDHRA PRADESH CHARITABLE AND HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND ENDOWMENTS LEASE OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS RULES, 2003 - INTERPRETATION - BURDEN OF RENEWAL OF STATUS NOT ON TENANT - TENANT ENTITLED TO CONTINUE AS TENANT SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF 2/3RD OF MARKET VALUE OF RENT.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners, recognized as landless poor persons under Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987, challenged an auction notice issued by the 3rd respondent-Charitable Institution proposing to auction the leasehold rights of the lands cultivated by them.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the proviso to Rule 3(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 does not require landless poor persons to obtain a fresh certificate every 3 years setting out their status as a landless poor person. The said proviso only permits the Endowments Authorities to review the status of the lessee and to ascertain whether the said lessee is entitled to be continued as a landless poor person or not.
Issues: Whether the burden of renewing the landless poor certification is on the tenant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the proviso to Rule 3(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 and held that it does not require the landless poor persons to obtain a fresh certificate every 3 years setting out their status as a landless poor person. The said proviso only permits the Endowments Authorities to review the status of the lessee and to ascertain whether the said lessee is entitled to be continued as a landless poor person or not.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and set aside the auction notice dated 12.10.2020. However, it permitted the 3rd respondent to ascertain the market value of the rent payable by the petitioners and call upon them to pay 2/3rd of the said market value as rent.
JUDGMENT :
R Raghunandan Rao, J. - The petitioners herein are the tenants of the 3rd respondent-Charitable Institution, who are all holding lands below Ac.2.50 cents of wet land or Ac.5.00 cents of dry land and had been recognized as landless poor persons, under Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act'), by way of proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing D.Dis.No.A3/1541/2004, dated 12.05.2004. The petitioners were being given all the benefits of the status of the landless poor persons and had continued as lessees of the 3rd respondent till now.
2. The 3rd respondent on 12.10.2020 issued an auction notice proposing to hold an auction on 22.10.2020, in respect of the lease hold rights of the lands which were being cultivated by the petitioners as lessees of the 3rd respondent. Thereupon, the petitioners had approached the 3rd respondent and placed the proceedings of the 2nd respondent, dated 12.05.2004 before the 3rd respondent in support of their claim, that they are the landless poor persons and would be entitled to continue as lessees of the 3rd respondent. However, the 3rd respondent sought to continue the auction. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners approached this Court by way of this writ petition.
3. This Court on 20.10.2020 had granted interim stay of all further proceedings in the auction for a period of six (6) weeks and the said order has been extended from time to time.
4. Heard Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.Ramana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the Endowments.
5. It is the case of Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners that once the petitioners have been recognized as landless poor persons, the said status would continue until an order is passed by the competent authority setting aside the said status. He submits that in the absence of any such order, the status of the petitioners as landless poor persons cannot be disturbed and they would be entitled to all the benefits available to such landless poor persons, including the right to continue as lessees of the 3rd respondent, subject to the conditions in the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act') and the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 (for short, 'the Rules of 2003').
6. Sri G.Ramana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent would submit that it is true that the orders of the 2nd respondent, dated 12.05.2004 declaring the status of the petitioners as landless poor persons has not been set aside. However, he submits that in view of the proviso to Sub-Rule (3) of the Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003, the burden of getting their declaration renewed every three years is on the petitioners and in view of the fact that such a renewal has not taken place, the 3rd respondent would be entitled to disregard the status of the petitioners as landless poor persons and go ahead with the auction.
7. The Proviso to Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 3 of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 reads as follows.
"Provided the status of every Land Less Poor tenant shall be reexamined once every three years and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.