SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 454

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Battu Devanand, J.
Siragam Krishna - Appellant
Versus
Chiranjeevi Chowdry - Respondent
Contempt Case No. 344 of 2021
Decided On : 06-07-2021

An amendment to a notification and corrigendum issued in violation of a court order is contempt of court.

Headnote:

CONTEMPT OF COURT - ANDHRA PRADESH HORTICULTURE SUBORDINATE SERVICE RULES, 2005 - G.O.MS.NO.64, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (H&S) DEPARTMENT, DATED 19.06.2020 - AMENDMENT TO NOTIFICATION AND CORRIGENDUM - VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER - PUNISHMENT. - [1] The amendment to the notification and corrigendum, dated 15.09.2020, issued by the Commissioner of Horticulture and the Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, respectively, was in violation of the court order dated 28.09.2020, which suspended the said amendment. [2] The respondents, being responsible for implementing the court order, are liable for punishment under the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the amendment to the notification and corrigendum issued by the Commissioner of Horticulture and the Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, respectively, on the ground that it violated the court order dated 28.09.2020, which suspended the said amendment. The respondents contended that there was no intentional or deliberate violation of the court order and that the amendment was issued in accordance with the service rules issued vide G.O.Ms.No.64, Agriculture and Cooperation (H&S) Department, dated 19.06.2020.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the amendment to the notification and corrigendum was issued in violation of the court order dated 28.09.2020, which suspended the said amendment. The court also found that the respondents were responsible for implementing the court order and that their actions in proceeding with the selection process as per the amendment were intentional, wilful, and deliberate.

Issues: Whether the amendment to the notification and corrigendum issued by the Commissioner of Horticulture and the Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, respectively, was in violation of the court order dated 28.09.2020, which suspended the said amendment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment to the notification and corrigendum was issued in violation of the court order dated 28.09.2020, which suspended the said amendment. The court also held that the respondents were responsible for implementing the court order and that their actions in proceeding with the selection process as per the amendment were intentional, wilful, and deliberate.

Final Decision: The court held the respondents guilty of contempt of court and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for nine days each and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each. However, the court modified the sentence on humanitarian grounds and sentenced the respondents to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.1,000/- each.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondents and perused the material available on record.

2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by both counsel and upon perusing the material available, the following facts emerged for consideration:

    (i) The Department of Horticulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh issued notification No.01/Horti/2020, dated 10.01.2020 for recruitment to the post Village Horticulture Assistants (1783 posts);

(ii) Corrigendum to notification No.01/Horti/2020, dated 10.01.2020 was issued on 30.01.2020 with regard to the educational qualifications mentioned at para No.3 of the notification;

(iii) Amendment, dated 15.09.2020 was issued to the notification, dated 10.01.2020 and corrigendum, dated 30.01.2020;

(iv) Notification, dated 10.01.2020 was issued in terms of G.O.Ms.No.110, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (MDL-I) Department, dated 19.07.2019 in which a onetime relaxation was given with regard to pre requirement of framing/amendment service rules before issue of recruitment notification is given due to urgency;

(v) The Government has issued the service rules for the post of Village Horticulture Assistant vide G.O.Ms.No.64, Agriculture and Cooperation (H&S) Department, dated 19.06.2020;

(vi) Government vide Memo No.AGC01-Hort/97/2020-HS of Agriculture and Cooperation (H&S) Department, dated 14.09.2020 issued orders permitting the Commissioner of Horticulture to withdraw the Corrigendum, dated 30.01.2020 issued to the notification, dated 10.01.2020;

(vii) In compliance to the instructions issued in Memo, dated 14.09.2020, the Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development was requested to withdraw the Corrigendum issued on 30.01.2020 to the notification, dated 10.01.2020 vide letter, dated 15.09.2020 of the Commissioner of Horticulture;

(viii) The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development has withdrawn the Corrigendum, dated 30.01.2020 to the notification, dated 10.01.2020 and posted the same on 17.09.2020 in web portal gramasachivalayam.ap.gov.in;

(ix) The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.17441 of 2020 against the amendment, dated 15.09.2020 to the notification, dated 10.01.2020 and Corrigendum, dated 30.01.2020;

(x) On 28.09.2020 in I.A.No.1 of 2020, this Court ordered interim suspension of the impugned amendment, dated 15.09.2020 issued by the 3rd respondent to the notification No.01/Horti/2020, dated 10.01.2020 and Corrigendum, dated 30.01.2020, pending disposal of the writ petition; and

(xi) On 05.03.2021 in I.A.No.2 of 2020, the interim order, dated 28.09.2020 in I.A.No.1 of 2020 is made absolute.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents contends that there is no intentional or deliberate violation by the respondents in implementing the interim order, dated 28.09.2020 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020. It is also contended that in view of the clarification given by this Court in its order, dated 05.03.2021 in I.A.No.2 of 2020 while the interim order, dated 28.09.2020 was made absolute, there is no any violation of the orders of this Court. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.64, Agriculture and Cooperation (H&S) Department, dated 19.06.2020 making amendments to the Andhra Pradesh Horticulture Subordinate Service Rules, 2005. The petitioners without challenging the service Rules issued vide G.O.Ms.No.64, dated 19.06.2020, which are intact, filed writ petition challenging the amendment made to the notification and corrigendum, which is not sustainable.

4. The findings of the Court:

    (1) The notification, dated 10.01.2020 was issued in terms of Sub Clause IX of Clause 14 of G.O.Ms.No.110, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (MDL-I) Department, dated 19.07.2019 in which a onetime relaxation granted by the Government.

(2) Amendments to the Andhra Pradesh Horticulture Subordinate Service Rules was issued vide G.O.Ms.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top