SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 482

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
Lalitha Kanneganti, J.
M. Narasimha Rao - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 3266 of 2021
Decided On : 25-06-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate

The surrender of other accused influenced the court's decision to direct the petitioner to surrender before the concerned Court for consideration of the bail application.

Headnote:

Pre-arrest Bail - A.P. Excise Act, 1968 - The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the concerned Court and stated that the bail application shall be considered on the same day of surrender.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in connection with a case alleging offences under the A.P. Excise Act, 1968. The prosecution's case involved the seizure of liquor and the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the concerned Court and stated that the bail application shall be considered on the same day of surrender.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's alleged involvement in the offence under the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 and the request for pre-arrest bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the surrender of other accused and deemed it appropriate to direct the petitioner to surrender before the concerned Court for the bail application to be considered.

Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to surrender before the concerned Court for consideration of the bail application.

JUDGMENT

Lalitha Kanneganti, J. - This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking prearrest bail to the petitioner/A-1 in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.98 of 2021 of Excise Station Macherla, Narsaraopeta Excise District, Guntur District, wherein the petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Section 34(A) and 50-B(1) of A.P. Excise Act, 1968.

2. The case of the prosecution is that 13.06.2021 on credible information by the excise officials, they secured the mediators at Adigoppala village and proceeded to scene of offence, where they found A-3 to A-6, who were shifting liquor cartons from a car and on verification, the police found total 1680 nip bottles of various brands. On enquiry, A-3 confessed that he purchased the said liquor from A-1 and A-2 and selling to A-5 at higher prices and while they were shifting the liquor in Tata Indica Vista Car bearing No.AP21 BF 7831. Then the excise police arrested the accused and seized the contraband under the cover of mediators report. Basing on the same, the present crime was registered.

3. Heard Sri Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been seized from the petitioner and he is not connected with the alleged offence. He submits that the neither the seized vehicle nor the rice mill belongs to the petitioner, in fact A-2 owns the same. He submits that due to village politics, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal history and his case may be considered for grant of bail.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that A-1 and A-2 are jointly doing business and enjoying the sale proceeds and the other accused have surrendered before the concerned Court, as such the petitioner is not entitled for prearrest bail.

6. Taking into consideration the fact that other accused have surrendered before the concerned Court, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner/A-1 to surrender before the concerned Court and on such surrender, the bail application filed by him shall be considered on the same day in accordance with law.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top