SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 497

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI
M. Ganga Rao, J.
Guttula Subrahmanyam - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 15305 of 2020
Decided On : 04-06-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Samson Babu, Advocate

The District Collector is required to delete the Government lands assigned prior to 1954 from the purview of the provisions of section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, as per G.O.Ms.No.575, Revenue (Assign.I) Department dated 16.11.2018.

Headnote:

REGISTRATION ACT - SECTION 22-A - PROHIBITED LANDS - DELETION OF LAND FROM PROHIBITED LIST - LAND ASSIGNED PRIOR TO 1954 - GOVERNMENT ORDER - DUTY OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR - MANDAMUS ISSUED.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner purchased land in survey No.367, Kolamuru Village, East Godavari District, through registered sale deeds in 2002 and 2004. When he presented the sale deeds for registration, the Sub-Registrar informed him that the land was included in the prohibited property list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act. Petitioner applied to the District Collector for deletion of the land from the prohibited list. The Tahsildar recommended deletion, citing assignment of the land to a private individual in 1933 and subsequent reclassification as Government Dry. The District Collector rejected the application, relying on webland records showing the land as Government land. Petitioner challenged the rejection.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the land was assigned to a private individual in 1933 and reclassified as Government Dry, as per revenue records. The District Collector's rejection of the application without considering the recommendations of the Tahsildar and the Government Order authorizing deletion of assigned lands from the prohibited list was illegal and arbitrary.

Issues: Whether the District Collector's rejection of the petitioner's application for deletion of his land from the prohibited property list was illegal and arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the District Collector's rejection of the petitioner's application was illegal and arbitrary. The court relied on the following legal principles: * The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.575, Revenue (Assign.I) Department dated 16.11.2018 authorizing the District Collector to delete the Government lands assigned prior to 18.06.1954 from the purview of the provisions of section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. * The District Collector failed to consider the land records and the recommendations of the Tahsildar, and simply rejected the application based on the webland record, which was contrary to the revenue records.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the District Collector to reconsider the petitioner's application and pass an appropriate reasoned order of deletion of the petitioner's land from the prohibited property list within four weeks.

JUDGMENT

M Ganga Rao, J. - This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief/s:

    "...to issue an appropriate Writ more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in including the lands of the petitioner in survey No.367 of Kolamuru Village, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District in the list of the Prohibitory lands under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, brushing aside the categorical recommendation of the Tahsildar, Rajamahendravaram Rural and which lands are recorded as Private lands for the last 87 years and the action of the Sub-Registrar in refusing to register the document presented before him, as being arbitrary, illegal and offending Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to delete the lands from list of Prohibitory lands under Section 22-A of Registration Act and to register the document as and when presented, in the interest of justice and issue such other Writ or order ..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps appearing for the respondents.

3. The case of the petitioner is that, he has purchased the land admeasuring 198 square yards forming part of survey No.367, situated at Kolamuru Village, Rajamahendravaram Rural Mandal of East Godavari District through registered sale deed documents bearing Nos.6215/2002, dated 10.12.2002 and 3210/2004 dated 14.05.2004 respectively registered in the office of the Sub- Registrar, Rajamahendravaram. Since then he has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. When he presented the sale deeds before the respondent No.6-Sub-Registrar for registration of the land in favour of buyers, he was informed that the land in survey No.367, Kolamuru Village is included in the prohibited property list maintained under Section 22-A of the Registration Act and there is prohibition for the registration of the land. Then the petitioner made a mee-seva application to the respondent No.2-District Collector for deletion of the subject property land from the prohibited property list. On his application the respondent No.5-Tahsildar submitted a report dated 06.08.2019 stating that, "the total of an extent of Ac 11.68 cents in survey No.367 of Kolamuru Village of Rajamahendravaram Rural Mandal is classified as "Government Poramboke" and mentioned as "Kankara Gutta Sthalam" in remarks column. Later the same total extent of Ac 11.68 cents in survey No.367 of Kolamuru Village of Rajamahendravaram Rural Mandal was re-classified as "Government Dry" and assigned to "Sri Chavali Rama Murthy Sastry" during the year, 1933 and the changes were incorporated in the A-Register as per East Godavari Collector's Kakinada vide R.Dis.2459/1933, dated 19.05.1933". The assignment of the land was made in the year 1933 as per G.O.Ms.No.575 Revenue (Assnt-I) Department, dated 16.11.2018, wherein the Government directed the revenue authorities to remove the lands which were assigned prior to the year 1954 from the prohibited properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act. Accordingly, the respondent No.5-Tahsildar vide Ref(B) 160/2019 dated 06.08.2019 recommended to remove the land to the total extent of Ac 11.68 cents in survey No.367 of Kolamuru Village of Rajamahendravaram Rural Mandal from the prohibited properties in Annexure-II under Section 22A(1)(b) of Registration Act, 1908.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.2-District Collector, without considering the report submitted by the respondent No.5-Tahsildar, issued an endorsement rejecting the petitioner's application by blindly referring to the proceedings E/2134/2019 dated 07.08.2019 of the respondent No.3-Sub-Collector, wherein he stated that, "the webland records, in respect of the subject land was entered as Government land and noted as Kankaragutta land. The changes in "A" Register regardi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top