ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Malireddy Venkata Raya Phaneendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arup Kumar Goswami, C.J. - Heard Mr. J. Ugranarasimha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Venkat Challa, learned Asst. Govt. Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate General, for respondents 1, 3 & 10 and Mr. D. Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Y. Nagi Reddy - learned counsel for respondent No.7. None appears for the other respondents.
2. This Public Interest Litigation (for short, "PIL") is filed by one Mr. Malireddy Venkata Phaneendra. While filing the Writ Petition, prayer was made to issue a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto, contending that respondent No.7 is an usurper of public office. Prayer was also made for a declaration that the appointment of respondent No.7 as Vice-Chancellor, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada (for short, "JNTU"), is void ab initio and to set aside G.O.Ms.No.31 dated 25.10.2018. Subsequently, prayer was altered to one seeking a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring G.O.Ms.No.31 dated 25.10.2018 appointing respondent No.7 as Vice-Chancellor, JNTU, Kakinada, as illegal being in violation of the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other A
Bholanath Mukherjee and others vs. Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananada Centenary College and others
Centre for PIL & Anr. vs. Union of India & Anr.
D. Manohar Rao vs. The State of Telangana and Ors.
Kalyani Mathivanan vs. K.V. Jeyaraj and others
Kashi Nath Misra vs. Chancellor, University of Allahabad
P. Seshadri vs. S. Mangati Gopal Reddy and others
Suresh Patilkhede of Thane vs. Chancellor, University of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.