ORDER :

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar)

1. The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the Order, dated 18.06.2019, passed in Lok Adalat Case No.885 of 2019, on the ground that (1) Respondent Nos. 3 to 8 therein colluded together and placed the terms of compromise before the Legal Services Authority, by forging the signature of the Petitioner on the memo of compromise and (2) that the Legal Services Authority went beyond its scope by adjudicating the rights of the 8th Respondent herein, though he was not a party to the suit, which is contrary to Section 20 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 [“Act”].

2. Originally, O.S. No. 40 of 2012 came to be filed before the District Court, Krishna at Machilipatnam, by the Petitioner herein seeking the following reliefs:

a) “direct the 1st Defendant to vacate and deliver the Plaint “A” schedule property to the Plaintiff by fixing time and in case of his failure permit the Plaintiff to get the possession of the Plaint Schedule Property through process of law.

b) cancelling the registered deed in favour of the 1st Defendant in respect of “B” schedule property which was registe