SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 524

M.VENKATA RAMANA
B. Ch. Ganga Raju S/o Suryanarayana Dora – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J. Satya Prasad.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners, who are the displaced persons under Polavaram Irrigation Project, have sought a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in not extending financial assistance for construction of houses by them under resettlement and rehabilitation package fixed by the State Government under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Act, 2013 (for short the Act 30 of 2013).

2. The petitioners 1, 2 and 8 are teachers. The petitioners 3 and 9 are employed in Police Department. The petitioner No. 5 is a Lab Assistant and the petitioner No. 4 is a Physical Director. The petitioners 6 and 7 are Home Makers. They claim that they are all residents of Mamidigondi Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District.

3. Mamidigondi Village was affected by submergence under Indira Saagar Project, which is Polavaram Irrigation Project. The petitioners claim that they had permanent houses in this village and where they were residing, employed in different professions and positions. They were all evacuated from Mamidigondi village during the year 2014-15 on account of the land acquisit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top