JUDGMENT :

The defendants 1 and 2 are the appellants.

2. The 1st respondent was the plaintiff. The 2nd respondent was the 3rd defendant.

3. The property in dispute is described in the plaint schedule as follows:

“‘A’ SCHEDULE-Open site situate in Kurnool District Nandyal Sub-District, Nandyal town, within the municipal limits of Nandyal in Street No.2:

East :Plots of Annajirao, Pedda Siva Rao, Mhendrakar Subbarao bathroom.

West : Sreenivasanagar Road,

North: Drainage channel,

South: Musala Pedda Eswararao and others site Measurements ‘E X W : 45’ N X S : 26’

‘B’-SCHEDULE: The portion which the plaintiff had taken in division with Pothula Guramma, Wife of Veeraiah in respect of half of ‘A’ schedule property (situate in street No.2)

East : Site of Annajirao son of Pedda Eswara Rao

West : Site of Pothula Guramma

North: Drainage Channel

South: Rastha”

4. B-schedule property stated above is part of plaint ‘A’ schedule property.

5. Plaint ‘A’ schedule property belonged to the joint family property of the appellants 1 and 2 and their father Sri Chinna Eeswara Rao. There were other properties belonging to Sri Chinna Ewswara Rao and his brothers around the plaint schedule properties.

6. Both the appellan