SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 883

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Tatturu Tarakanath – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. Nitesh
For the Respondent: N. Ranga Reddy, SC

ORDER :

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks declaration; that the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned notice, dated 16.4.2021, to the petitioner, directing him to remove the construction of the house in an extent of 7.25 meters within three days from the date of receipt of the notice on the, ground that the petitioner encroached on to the Municipal site, without calling for his explanation, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently, sought direction to the respondents not to take any coercive steps and interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the said construction.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for 1st respondent and Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, for respondents 2 and 3.

3. As per the facts pleaded by the petitioner, he has purchased an old house bearing Door No. 7/2634, which is in an extent of 97.2 Sq.yards in Ward No. 7 in Proddatur Town of YSR Kadapa District, on 17.10.2016 from one Mr. Sakam Vijaya Bhaskar. The petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top