IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.
S. Rajasekhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 16312 of 2020
Decided On : 20-10-2020
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 14 and 300-A - A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition on Transfers) Act, 1977 - A.P. Rights in Laudand Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 - Section 5-A - Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 - Rule 9(1)(iv) - Writ of Mandamus - Property of petitioner is kept under disputed land register – Writ petition is filed questioning action of fourth respondent in marking with Red Colour in Adangal as well as 1-B pertaining to agricultural land of Petitioner - Held, words “a notice to all persons known or believed to be interested to effect that registry will be made” assumes importance in present case - According to petitioner, no notice was issued to this petitioner, respondent also did not dispute contention of petitioner about failure to issue notice - On ground of violation of procedure prescribed under Rule 9(1)(c)(ii), order challenged is liable to be set-aside, without further going into merits of case - Placing property of this petitioner in disputed register without following procedure contemplated under Rule 9(1)(c)(ii) is an illegality and same is liable to be set-aside - On ground of violation of Rule 9(1)(c)(ii), order placing this petitioner's property in disputed register is set-aside, declaring action of fourth respondent as illegal and arbitrary - Writ petition disposed of.
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
2. It is the case of the petitioner that, in the year 1969, the land to an extent of Ac. 5.04 cents in Sy. No. 131/1 of Pellakur Village and Mandal was assigned by the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Pellakur in favour of one E. Bhasker Naidu, S/o. E. Swamy Naidu under Freedom Fighter's quota. Subsequently in the year 1970 the said original assignee alienated the said land to one Papa Naidu. Subsequently in the year 1973, the said Papa Naidu sold away the subject lands to one Bathina Narasaiah through registered sale deed. Again on 20-2-2007 the purchaser Bathina Narasaiah in turn alienated the land to an extent of Ac. 5.04 cents in favour of Nagati Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy through a Registered sale deed for valuable sale consideration.
3. Thereupon the then Tahsildar, Pellakur initiated action under the provisions of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition on Transfers) Act, 1977 and resumed the land to the government. But before resuming the land, Form-II Notice was not issued to the purchaser of Nagati Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy. Thereafter in the year 2008 Tahsildar passed orders assigned the said land in favour of the legal heirs of the original assignee i.e. his wife and daughter at the rate of Ac. 2-52 cents each. Though the Tahsildar passed resumption order and assigned in favour of legal heirs of the original assignee, the land is in possession of the Nagati Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy and he is cultivating the lands by raising paddy crop.
4. On coming to know the action of the Tahsildar in making division of the subject land and granting assignments in favour of legal heirs of the original assignee equally, the said purchaser, Nagati Vijaya Bhasker Reddy, filed appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer. Gudur, requesting to cancel the assignments made in favour of them. Subsequently he also filed W.P. No. 21529 of 2008. Thereupon, on 13-09-2008 this Court granted Interim order vide WPMP No. 28121/2008 and directed the respondents to maintain Status Quo as on date. On 11-10-2010 the original Assignee E. Baskar Naidu also filed a representation before the District Collector, Nellore stating that the said Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy is obstructing cultivation of the land and praying to consider their case. Thereupon, on 10-12-2010 the Joint Collector. Nellore passed orders by directing the Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudur to dispose of the appeal filed by Nagati Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy and also directed the Tahsildar to restore the possession of the land to Nagati Vijayabhaskar Reddy as per the directions of this Court and also make necessary entries in the revenue records. Pursuant to the orders of the Joint Collector, Nellore, on 20-05-2011 the Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudur, pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.