M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Pathuri Anantha Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
1. One Pathuri Anantha Ramaiah and Korrapati Venkat Rao filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the action of the fifth respondent in refusing to receive and process the sale deed presented by this petitioners pertaining to the property admeasuring 185.77 sq.yds situated in D. No. 15-1C, Vaddavalli Village, Sattenapalli Mandal, Guntur District and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to receive and process the Sale Deed presented by the petitioners in respect of the above property.
2. The facts of the case in nut-shell are that, originally, property in an extent of Ac.0-50 cents in 15/1C and Ac.0-05 cents in 15/2C was purchased by one Syed Adam in auction proceedings of the Commissioner, Endowments Department vide R.C. No. M2/56940/1990 dated 04.05.1992 from the Endowments Department. Accordingly, the Executive Officer, Sri Veeranjaneya Swami Temple, Vadavalli Village, Sattenapalli Town & Mandal, Guntur District executed registered Sale Deed Document
Vinjamuri Rajagopalachari v. State of Andhra Pradesh 2016 (1) ALT 550
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.