SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, K.MANMADHA RAO, JJ.
Rapuru Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State Of A.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.734 of 2015
Decided on : 20-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : H. PRAHALADA REDDY

Point of Law: Dying declaration - Corroboration from the oral dying declarations made by the deceased, coupled with the evidence of Doctor.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A and 302 – Criminal Procedure code,1973 – Section 207,209 and 313 - Dowry Harassment – Murder – P.Ws.8 and 9 are sisters of deceased, while accused is husband of deceased - Marriage of accused with deceased took place about 12 years prior to the date of incident - They were blessed with two female children and both of them were studying at time of incident - Deceased was working as an Anganwadi Teacher - While the accused was a mason - It is stated that accused used to harass deceased right from beginning and he was also addicted to alcohol - Some criminal cases were filed against accused by deceased, which ended in a compromise.

Finding of the Court:

Court are of opinion that there is no inconsistency in two statements made by deceased with regard to manner in which the incident took place - On the other hand, both the statements categorically disclose as to how accused caused the death of deceased viz. pouring kerosene on the body, closing doors and setting her on fire, thereby preventing her from moving out of room - Apart from that, evidence of these witnesses also disclose acts of harassment which led to registration of criminal cases, which were compromised at the instance of elders and thereafter accused again harassing the deceased after she joined him - Having regard to factors, court feel that it is a case where one cannot doubt Ex.P12-dying declaration recorded by P.W.14, as same gets corroboration from oral dying declarations made by deceased, coupled with evidence of Doctor - Considering these aspects, court hold that learned Sessions Judge rightly convicted and sentenced appellant/accused and same needs no interference by this Court - Accordingly, Criminal Appeal is dismissed, confirming judgment in Sessions Case on file of VII Additional Sessions Judge.

Result: Criminal Appeal disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

C.Praveen Kumar, J.

1. Sole accused in Sessions Case No.186 of 2013 on the file of the VII Additional Sessions Judge, SPSR Nellore District at Gudur is the appellant herein. He was tried for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for subjecting his wife by name Puttamma to cruelty and causing her death on 14.04.2012. Vide judgment dated 16.07.2015, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the accused under both the counts and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of two months for the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC. The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Assailing the same, the present Criminal Appeal is filed.

2. The facts, as revealed from the evidence of prosecution witnesses, are as under.

P.Ws.8 and 9 are sisters of the deceased Puttamma, while the accused is the husband of the deceased. Marriage of the accused with the deceased took place about 12 years prior to the date of the incident. They were blessed with two female children and both of them were studying at the time of the incident. The deceased was working as an Anganwadi Teacher at Yachavaram, while the accused was a mason. It is stated that the accused used to harass the deceased right from the beginning and he was also addicted to alcohol. Some criminal cases were filed against the accused by the deceased, which, however, ended in a compromise. Even thereafter, the accused used to beat the deceased. While things stood thus, on 14.04.2012 at about 1.00 or 1.30 PM, there was some noise from the house of the accused, which made P.W.3, P.W.7 and others run towards the house of the deceased. On reaching there, they noticed the doors of the house closed and the accused was standing in front of the western side door of the house. He was raising alarm stating that his wife was burnt. Out of the two doors, one door was locked from inside while the other door was locked from outside. Western side door which was locked from inside was broke open with the help of a crow bar by the villagers. On entering the house, the neighbours found the deceased with burn injuries. The accused, who was there at that time, left that place. Immediately, information about the incident was given to P.Ws. 1, 2 and others. The people who gathered there, more particularly family members of the deceased, except the husband, shifted the injured to Gudur Hospital in an Ambulance.

P.W.14, who was working as Head Constable of I Town Police Station, Gudur, received intimation about the admission of the injured in the Government Hospital, Gudur. Ex.P11 is the said intimation. On receipt of the said intimation, he proceeded to the hospital and recorded the statement of the deceased, which was also endorsed by P.W.16-Doctor, who was present at the time of the recording the statement. Ex.P12 is the said statement. The same was informed to Manubolu police station on the point of jurisdiction. From Gudur Hospital, the injured was shifted to Narayana Hospital, Nellore, where she died by 5.00 PM.

Basing on Ex.P12, P.W.15-Head Constable of Manubolu police station registered a case in crime No.55 of 2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 307 IPC. Ex.P13 is the F.I.R. After receiving death intimation from the hospital, which is marked as Ex.P14, he altered the section of law to one under Section 302 IPC. Ex.P15 is the altered F.I.R.

P.W.18, Inspector of Police, took up further investigation in the matter. On receipt of the altered F.I.R., he proceeded to Narayana General Hospital, Nellore and recorded statements of P.Ws.1 to 3. From there, he, along with his staff, went to the scene of occurrence and prepared panchanama of the

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top