2022 Supreme(AP) 100
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
K. Sarswathamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Parineeta
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief:
To issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.6 refusing to pay the compensation awarded through the Award Nos.LA/NH4-4 Gangavaram/Gangavaram/1/2017 dated 19.09.2017 for the lands in an extent of 445-170 sq.mts in Sy.No.702/1, 526.110 mts in Sy.No.703/1, 364.230 sq.mts in Sy.No.204/1, 1011.750 sq.mts in Sy.No.704/2A, 809 sq.mts in Sy.No.705, 607.050 sq.mts in Sy.No.706, 364.230 sq.mts in Sy.No.707/2, 80.940 sq.mts in Sy.No.708/2, 566.580 sq.mts in Sy.No.709/2, 971.280 sq.mts in Sy.No.709/3, 323.760 sq.mts in Sy.No.709/4B, 1861.620 sq.mts in Sy.No.714/2, 1011.750 sq.mts in Sy.No.711/4 and Supplementary Award No.NH-4-4/Gangavaram/Gangavaram/01/2017 dated 15.12.2017 in Voucher Nos.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 & 25 forthwith for formation of Bangalore-Chennai Express Way at the instance of Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 as arbitrary, illegal, quite contrary to the procedure envisaged under the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 and well established legal position apart from being violative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 1
Click Here to Read the rest of this document