C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, V.SUJATHA
Union Bank of India Erstwhile Andhra Bank – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
C.Praveen Kumar, J.
1. The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not receiving and not registering the sale certificate issued by the petitioner-Bank under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SARFAESI Act’) in respect of the property in dispute, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.
2. Heard Ms.V.Dyumani, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Government Pleader for Revenue on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. As notices sent by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due were not received by the unofficial respondents, a paper publication was given informing about the filing of case and date on which the case is likely to be taken up. In spite of the same, there is no representation on behalf of the unofficial respondents.
3. The circumstances, which lead to filing of the present writ petition are as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.