ORDER :

This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful respondent/defendant, is directed against the orders dated 31.01.2019, of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, passed in IA.No.1941 of 2018 in OS.No.46 of 2008 filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘the Code’, for brevity) requesting to permit her to amend the plaint schedule survey number as S.No.306/2 instead of S.No.396/2 and consequential correction in the survey number in the records.

2. Heard Mr. Sodum Anvesha, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/defendant and Mr. V. Nithesh, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff and defendant.

3. The case of the petitioner/plaintiff, as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the request for amendment, in brief, is that in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 04.02.2004, at the stage of arguments, it was noticed that there was a typographical mistake in the suit schedule survey number by mentioning as ‘S.No.396/2’, instead of ‘S.No.306/2.’ as tick mark ‘ ‘ which is a part of the